Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 11:2023:baad057.
doi: 10.1093/database/baad057.

CCIDB: a manually curated cell-cell interaction database with cell context information

Affiliations

CCIDB: a manually curated cell-cell interaction database with cell context information

Jin Young Noh et al. Database (Oxford). .

Abstract

Cell-cell interaction (CCI) is a crucial event in the development and function of multicellular organisms. The development of CCI databases is beneficial for researchers who want to analyze single-cell sequencing data or study CCI through molecular experiments. CCIs are known to act differently according to cellular and biological contexts such as cell types, gene mutations or disease status; however, previous CCI databases do not completely provide this contextual information pertaining to CCIs. We constructed a cell-cell interaction database (CCIDB) containing the biological and clinical contexts involved in each interaction. To build a database of cellular and tissue contexts, we collected 38 types of context features, which were categorized into seven categories, including 'interaction', 'cell type', 'cofactor', 'effector', 'phenotype', 'pathology' and 'reference'. CCIs were manually retrieved from 272 studies published recently (less than 6 years ago). In the current version of CCIDB, 520 CCIs and their 38 context features have been manually collected and curated by biodata engineers. We suggest that CCIDB is a manually curated CCI resource that is highly useful, especially for analyzing context-dependent alterations in CCIs. Database URL https://ccidb.sysmed.kr/.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of CCIDB. (a–d) Pie plots showing the distribution of the features in CCIDB, including species (a), disease type (b), cancer type (c), interaction type (d, left) and signaling type of the LR interactions (d, right). (e–f) Bar plots showing the top-ranked 10 frequent source cell types (e, left), target cell types (e, right), source genes (f, left) and target genes (f, right).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Intracellular communication network analysis using CCIDB in breast cancer. (a) Cell types of the 100,064 cells of breast cancer patients are indicated in a UMAP plot. (b) The inferred intracellular communication network across cell types. Circle size is proportional to the number of cells in each cell group and edge width represents the communication probability. (c) A Venn diagram shows the distribution of interaction pairs identified from CCIDB and CellChatDB. (d) A circle plot shows the interactions of top ranked source-target gene pairs across cell groups. The circle color and size represent the calculated communication probability and P-values, respectively. The red asterisks indicate the pairs found in CCIDB.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Construction of CCI network. (a) The liver cancer network (LCN) was constructed with six context features, namely ‘source tissue’, ‘source cell type’, ‘source gene’, ‘target gene’, ‘target cell type’ and ‘target tissue’ using Cytoscape. (b) The LCN (left) and BCN (right) constructed by integrating CCIDB and previous four CCI databases are shown. The source databases of CCIDB (blue) and others (cyan) are indicated in different colors, and hub pair genes are indicated (red).

References

    1. Shao X., Lu X., Liao J.. et al. (2020) New avenues for systematically inferring cell-cell communication: through single-cell transcriptomics data. Protein Cell., 11, 866–880. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ximerakis M., Lipnick S.L., Innes B.T.. et al. (2019) Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci., 22, 1696–1708. - PubMed
    1. Cabello-Aguilar S., Alame M., Kon-Sun-Tack F.. et al. (2020) SingleCellSignalR: inference of intercellular networks from single-cell transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res., 48, e55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Efremova M., Vento-Tormo M., Teichmann S.A.. et al. (2020) CellPhoneDB: inferring cell-cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand-receptor complexes. Nat Protoc, 15, 1484–1506. - PubMed
    1. Jin S., Guerrero-Juarez C.F., Zhang L.. et al. (2021) Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun., 12, 1088. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources