Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;55(2):2244873.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2244873.

Sex differences in clinical presentation and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis

Affiliations

Sex differences in clinical presentation and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis

Vera H M Wanrooij et al. Ann Med. 2023.

Abstract

Background: There is growing awareness that sex differences are associated with different patient outcomes in a variety of diseases. Studies investigating the effect of patient sex on sepsis-related mortality remain inconclusive and mainly focus on patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit. We therefore investigated the association between patient sex and both clinical presentation and 30-day mortality in patients with the whole spectrum of sepsis severity presenting to the emergency department (ED) who were admitted to the hospital.

Materials and methods: In our multi-centre cohort study, we retrospectively investigated adult medical patients with sepsis in the ED. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the association between patient sex and all-cause 30-day mortality.

Results: Of 2065 patients included, 47.6% were female. Female patients had significantly less comorbidities, lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and abbreviated Mortality Emergency Department Sepsis score, and presented less frequently with thrombocytopenia and fever, compared to males. For both sexes, respiratory tract infections were predominant while female patients more often had urinary tract infections. Females showed lower 30-day mortality (10.1% vs. 13.6%; p = .016), and in-hospital mortality (8.0% vs. 11.1%; p = .02) compared to males. However, a multivariable logistic regression model showed that patient sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.67-1.22; p = .51).

Conclusions: Females with sepsis presenting to the ED had fewer comorbidities, lower disease severity, less often thrombocytopenia and fever and were more likely to have a urinary tract infection. Females had a lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality compared to males, but sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. The lower mortality in female patients may be explained by differences in comorbidity and clinical presentation compared to male patients.KEY MESSAGESOnly limited data exist on sex differences in sepsis patients presenting to the emergency department with the whole spectrum of sepsis severity.Female sepsis patients had a lower incidence of comorbidities, less disease severity and a different source of infection, which explains the lower 30-day mortality we found in female patients compared to male patients.We found that sex was not an independent predictor of 30-day mortality; however, the study was probably underpowered to evaluate this outcome definitively.

Keywords: Sepsis; critical care; emergency department; mortality; sex; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier’s survival curves for 30-days survival stratified by sex.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plots based on the results of the univariable and multivariable analyses of the risk factors associated with all-cause 30-day mortality. CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. . Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruggieri A, Anticoli S, D’Ambrosio A, et al. . The influence of sex and gender on immunity, infection and vaccination. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52:198–204. - PubMed
    1. Pennell LM, Galligan CL, Fish EN.. Sex affects immunity. J Autoimmun. 2012;38(2–3):J282–J291. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.11.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giefing-Kröll C, Berger P, Lepperdinger G, et al. . How sex and age affect immune responses, susceptibility to infections, and response to vaccination. Aging Cell. 2015;14(3):309–321. doi: 10.1111/acel.12326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wichmann MW, Inthorn D, Andress HJ, et al. . Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(2):167–172. doi: 10.1007/s001340050041. - DOI - PubMed