Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 11;7(1):40.
doi: 10.1038/s41538-023-00217-y.

A model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins

Affiliations
Review

A model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins

Kiran Bhardwaj et al. NPJ Sci Food. .

Abstract

Risk communication is defined as the interactive exchange of information and opinions concerning risk, risk-related factors and risk perceptions amongst all the stakeholders of food safety throughout the risk analysis process. The interactive exchange of information occurs at three different levels i.e. informed level, dialogue level and engagement level. For an effective food safety risk communication (FSRC), it is important that the information should adhere to the core principles of risk communication which are transparency, openness, responsiveness and timeliness. Communication of a food safety risk within all the components of risk communication strategy constitutes a complex network of information flow that can be better understood with the help of a framework. Therefore, a model framework to communicate the risks associated with aflatoxins (AFs) dietary intake has been developed with the aim of (a) creating general awareness amongst public and (b) involving industry stakeholders in the prevention and control of risk. The framework has been motivated by the learnings and best practices outlined in the identified technical guidance documents for risk communication. Risk assessors, risk managers, industry stakeholders and general public have been identified as the major stakeholders for the present framework. Amongst them, industry stakeholders and general public has been selected as the major target audience for risk managers. Moreover, population residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has been identified as the main target group to reach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests. C.E. is Co- Editor-in-Chief of npj Science of Food but C.E. was not involved in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to, this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Model framework.
Proposed risk communication framework for communicating the risk associated with AFs amongst relevant stakeholders via various channels and tools.

References

    1. Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO). Risk communication applied to food safety handbook. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5863e.pdf (2016).
    1. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Maxim, L. et al. Technical assistance in the field of risk communication. EFSA J. 19, e06574 (2021).. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA. When food is cooking up a storm: proven recipes for risk communications. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2805/119491 (2018). - DOI
    1. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ); Hong J. and Philpott A. APEC Food Safety Risk Communication Framework and Associated Guidelines, APEC Secretariat, Singapore. https://www.apec.org/publications/2022/02/apec-food-safety-risk-communic... (2022).
    1. EFSA. Food borne zoonotic Diseases. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en. (2011-2012).