Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;37(11):8755-8763.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10328-y. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Affiliations

Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Masahiro Kawamura et al. Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The Critical View of Safety (CVS) was proposed in 1995 to prevent bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The achievement of CVS was evaluated subjectively. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to evaluate CVS scores in LC.

Materials and methods: AI software was developed to evaluate the achievement of CVS using an algorithm for image classification based on a deep convolutional neural network. Short clips of hepatocystic triangle dissection were converted from 72 LC videos, and 23,793 images were labeled for training data. The learning models were examined using metrics commonly used in machine learning.

Results: The mean values of precision, recall, F-measure, specificity, and overall accuracy for all the criteria of the best model were 0.971, 0.737, 0.832, 0.966, and 0.834, respectively. It took approximately 6 fps to obtain scores for a single image.

Conclusions: Using the AI system, we successfully evaluated the achievement of the CVS criteria using still images and videos of hepatocystic triangle dissection in LC. This encourages surgeons to be aware of CVS and is expected to improve surgical safety.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Critical View of Safety; Iatrogenic disease; Image classification; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reynolds W Jr. (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ (2002) Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg 235:888–895 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, Saunders-Kirkwood K, Zinner MJ, Cates JA (1993) Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg 218:129–137 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125 - PubMed
    1. Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Akira S, Kanayama H, Yamaguchi S, Eguchi S, Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Uchida H, Seki Y, Ieiri S, Iwazaki M, Sato Y, Kitamura K, Tabata M, Mimata H, Takahashi H, Uemura T, Akagi T, Taniguchi F, Miyajima A, Hashizume M, Matsumoto S, Kitano S, Watanabe M, Sakai Y (2022) Current status of endoscopic surgery in Japan: the 15th national survey of endoscopic surgery by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 15:415–426 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources