Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 29;12(15):5001.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12155001.

Comparative Analysis of Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes in Elderly and Nonelderly Patients Undergoing Elective TEVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparative Analysis of Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes in Elderly and Nonelderly Patients Undergoing Elective TEVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Angelos Frisiras et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Due to an ever-increasing ageing population and limited available data around the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in elderly patients, investigating its efficacy and safety in this age cohort is of vital importance. We thus reviewed the existing literature on this topic to assess the feasibility of TEVAR in elderly patients with severe thoracic aortic pathologies.

Methods: We identified all original research studies that assessed TEVAR in elderly patients published up to 2023. Morbidity, as assessed by neurological and respiratory complications, endoleaks, and length of stay, was the primary endpoint. Short-term mortality and long-term survival were the secondary endpoints. The Mantel-Haenszel random and fixed effects methods were used to calculate the odds ratios for each outcome. Further sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to validate the outcomes.

Results: Twelve original studies that evaluated elective TEVAR outcomes in elderly patients were identified. Seven studies directly compared the use of TEVAR between an older and a younger patient group. Apart from a shorter hospital stay in older patients, no statistically significant difference between the morbidity outcomes of the two different cohorts was found. Short-term mortality and long-term survival results favoured the younger population.

Conclusions: The present meta-analysis indicates that, due to a safe perioperative morbidity profile, TEVAR should not be contraindicated in patients based purely on old age. Further research using large patient registries to validate our findings in elderly patients with specific aortic pathologies and both elective and emergency procedures is necessary.

Keywords: TEVAR; age; elderly; endovascular repair; morbidity; mortality; thoracic aorta.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Chart of the current systematic review and meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. (b) Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool with summary plot. References: [3,6,7,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Comparison of neurological complications between elderly and nonelderly patients undergoing TEVAR. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for neurological complications in elderly patients. References: [6,7,12,14,16].
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Comparison of rate of endoleaks between elderly vs. nonelderly patients undergoing TEVAR. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for the rate of endoleaks. References: [3,12,18].
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Comparison of respiratory complications between elderly vs. nonelderly patients undergoing TEVAR. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for respiratory complications. References: [6,12,16,18].
Figure 6
Figure 6
(a) Comparison of length of hospital stay between elderly vs. nonelderly patients undergoing TEVAR. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for length of hospital stay. References: [12,14,16,18].
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Comparison of short-term mortality between elderly vs. nonelderly patients. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for short-term mortality in elderly patients. References: [3,6,7,12,14,16,18].
Figure 8
Figure 8
(a) Comparison of short-term mortality between elderly patients undergoing elective vs. emergency TEVAR procedures. (b) Funnel plot assessing the publication bias for short-term mortality in elective vs. emergency TEVAR procedures. References: [7,11,13].
Figure 9
Figure 9
Cumulative Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival (OS) of elderly vs. nonelderly patients undergoing TEVAR.

References

    1. Nation D., Wang G. TEVAR: Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2015;32:265–271. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558824. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu J., Xia J., Yan G., Zhang Y., Ge J., Cao L. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus open chest surgical repair for patients with type B aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Med. 2019;51:360–370. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1679874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Czerny M., Funovics M., Ehrlich M., Hoebartner M., Sodeck G., Dumfarth J., Schoder M., Juraszek A., Dziodzio T., Loewe C., et al. Risk Factors of Mortality in Different Age Groups After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010;90:534–538. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonker F., Verhagen H., Heijmen R., Lin P., Trimarchi S., Lee W., Moll F., Athamneh H., Muhs B. Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm in Patients Older than 75 Years. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011;41:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonker F.H., Verhagen H.J., Heijmen R.H., Lin P.H., Trimarchi S., Lee W.A., Moll F.L., Athamneh H., Muhs B.E. Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: Predictors of Procedure-Related Stroke. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2011;25:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.05.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources