Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 25;15(15):3760.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15153760.

Textbook Oncological Outcomes for Robotic Colorectal Cancer Resections: An Observational Study of Five Robotic Colorectal Units

José Moreira Azevedo  1   2 , Sofoklis Panteleimonitis  1   3   4 , Danilo Mišković  4 , Ignacio Herrando  1 , Mahmood Al-Dhaheri  5 , Mukhtar Ahmad  6 , Tahseen Qureshi  6 , Laura Melina Fernandez  1 , Mick Harper  3 , Amjad Parvaiz  1   3
Affiliations

Textbook Oncological Outcomes for Robotic Colorectal Cancer Resections: An Observational Study of Five Robotic Colorectal Units

José Moreira Azevedo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The quality of care of patients receiving colorectal resections has conventionally relied on individual metrics. When discussing with patients what these outcomes mean, they often find them confusing or overwhelming. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) is a composite measure that summarises all the 'desirable' or 'ideal' postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes from both a patient's and doctor's point of view. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of TOO in patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer surgery in five robotic colorectal units and understand the risk factors associated with failure to achieve a TOO in these patients.

Methods: We present a retrospective, multicentric study with data from a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer resections from five centres between 2013 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and short-term clinical and oncological data were collected. A TOO was achieved when all components were realized-no conversion to open, no complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3, length of hospital stay ≤ 14, no 30-day readmission, no 30-day mortality, and R0 resection. The main outcome measure was a composite measure of "ideal" practice called textbook oncological outcomes.

Results: A total of 501 patients submitted to robotic colorectal cancer resection were included. Of the 501 patients included, 388 (77.4%) achieved a TOO. Four patients were converted to open (0.8%); 55 (11%) had LOS > 14 days; 46 (9.2%) had a CD ≥ 3 complication; 30-day readmission rate was 6% (30); 30-day mortality was 0.2% (1); and 480 (95.8%) had an R0 resection. Abdominoperineal resection was a risk factor for not achieving a TOO.

Conclusions: Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in robotic centres achieves a high TOO rate. Abdominoperineal resection is a risk factor for failure to achieve a TOO. This measure may be used in future audits and to inform patients clearly on success of treatment.

Keywords: colon cancer; colorectal cancer; quality of care; rectal cancer; robotic surgery; surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The rates of the individual TOO parameters (bars) and cumulative percentage (line) of TOO after each parameter.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ricciardi R., Roberts P.L., Read T.E., Marcello P.W., Schoetz D.J., Baxter N.N. Variability in reconstructive procedures following rectal cancer surgery in the United States. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2010;53:874–880. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181cf6f58. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monson J.R.T., Probst C.P., Wexner S.D., Remzi F.H., Fleshman J.W., Garcia-Aguilar J., Chang G.J., Dietz D.W. Failure of evidence-based cancer care in the United States: The association between rectal cancer treatment, cancer center volume, and geography. Ann. Surg. 2014;260:622–625. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panteleimonitis S., Miskovic D., Bissett-Amess R., Figueiredo N., Turina M., Spinoglio G., Heald R.J., Parvaiz A. Short-term clinical outcomes of a European training programme for robotic colorectal surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2020;35:6796–6806. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08184-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dijs-Elsinga J., Otten W., Versluijs M.M., Smeets H.J., Kievit J., Vree R., van der Made W.J., de Mheen P.J.M.-V. Choosing a hospital for surgery: The importance of information on quality of care. Med. Decis. Mak. 2010;30:544–555. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357474. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolfschoten N., Kievit J., Gooiker G., van Leersum N., Snijders H., Eddes E., Tollenaar R., Wouters M., de Mheen P.M.-V. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in “textbook outcome”. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;39:156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources