Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 7;24(15):12520.
doi: 10.3390/ijms241512520.

Promise and Challenges of T Cell Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma

Affiliations
Review

Promise and Challenges of T Cell Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma

Jeong A Park et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The cure rate for metastatic or relapsed osteosarcoma has not substantially improved over the past decades despite the exploitation of multimodal treatment approaches, allowing long-term survival in less than 30% of cases. Patients with osteosarcoma often develop resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, where personalized targeted therapies should offer new hope. T cell immunotherapy as a complementary or alternative treatment modality is advancing rapidly in general, but its potential against osteosarcoma remains largely unexplored. Strategies incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells, and T cell engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are being explored to tackle relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. However, osteosarcoma is an inherently heterogeneous tumor, both at the intra- and inter-tumor level, with no identical driver mutations. It has a pro-tumoral microenvironment, where bone cells, stromal cells, neovasculature, suppressive immune cells, and a mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) combine to derail T cell infiltration and its anti-tumor function. To realize the potential of T cell immunotherapy in osteosarcoma, an integrated approach targeting this complex ecosystem needs smart planning and execution. Herein, we review the current status of T cell immunotherapies for osteosarcoma, summarize the challenges encountered, and explore combination strategies to overcome these hurdles, with the ultimate goal of curing osteosarcoma with less acute and long-term side effects.

Keywords: T cell engaging bispecific antibody; T cell immunotherapy; chimeric antigen receptor; immune checkpoint inhibitors; myeloid-derived suppressor cells; osteosarcoma; tumor microenvironment; tumor-associated macrophage; vascular endothelial growth factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

N.K.C. and J.A.P. both declare that this study received funding from the following institutions. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. Both N.K.C. and J.A.P. were named as inventors on the patent of EATs filed by M.S.K. Both M.S.K. and N.K.C. have financial interest in Y-mAbs, Abpro-Labs and Eureka Therapeutics. N.K.C. reports receiving past commercial research grants from Y-mabs Therapeutics and Abpro-Labs Inc. N.K.C. was named as inventor on multiple patents filed by M.S.K., including those licensed to Ymabs Therapeutics, Biotec Pharmacon, and Abpro-labs. N.K.C. is a SAB member for Eureka Therapeutics.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumor microenvironment of osteosarcoma. Osteosarcoma tumor tissues have large populations of tumors infiltrating myeloid cells (TIMs), including MDSCs and TAMs. Immunosuppressive TIMs and dense ECM around osteosarcoma cells impede T cell infiltration and cytotoxic activity. Tumor infiltrating T cells express PD-1, and the interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and TIMs exhaust cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells, inducing tumor-immune tolerance. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) release TGF-β and convert ATP to adenosine via CD39 and CD73, inhibiting T cell cytotoxicity and promoting tumor progression [101]. M2 polarized TAMs and MDSCs also release immune-suppressive cytokines and chemokines including TGFβ, TNF-α, IL-10, prostaglandins, arginase, and VEGF, inducing osteosarcoma progression and immune evasion [102].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luetke A., Meyers P.A., Lewis I., Juergens H. Osteosarcoma treatment—Where do we stand? A state of the art review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2014;40:523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Longhi A., Ferrari S., Tamburini A., Luksch R., Fagioli F., Bacci G., Ferrari C. Late effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma patients: The Italian Sarcoma Group Experience (1983–2006) Cancer. 2012;118:5050–5059. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isakoff M.S., Bielack S.S., Meltzer P., Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma: Current Treatment and a Collaborative Pathway to Success. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:3029–3035. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4895. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coley W.B. The Treatment of Inoperable Sarcoma by Bacterial Toxins (the Mixed Toxins of the Streptococcus erysipelas and the Bacillus prodigiosus) Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1910;3:1–48. doi: 10.1177/003591571000301601. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muller C.R., Smeland S., Bauer H.C., Saeter G., Strander H. Interferon-alpha as the only adjuvant treatment in high-grade osteosarcoma: Long term results of the Karolinska Hospital series. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:475–480. doi: 10.1080/02841860510029978. - DOI - PubMed