Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 27;23(15):6735.
doi: 10.3390/s23156735.

Laboratory Results of a Real-Time SHM Integrated System on a P180 Full-Scale Wing-Box Section

Affiliations

Laboratory Results of a Real-Time SHM Integrated System on a P180 Full-Scale Wing-Box Section

Monica Ciminello et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The final objective of the study herein reported is the preliminary evaluation of the capability of an original, real-time SHM system applied to a full-scale wing-box section as a significant aircraft component, during an experimental campaign carried out at the Piaggio Lab in Villanova D'Albenga, Italy. In previous works, the authors have shown that such a system could be applied to composite beams, to reveal damage along the bonding line between a longitudinal stiffening element and the cap. Utilizing a suitable scaling process, such work has then been exported to more complex components, in order to confirm the outcomes that were already achieved, and, possibly, expanding the considerations that should drive the project towards an actual implementation of the proposed architecture. Relevant topics dealt with in this publication concern the application of the structural health monitoring system to different temperature ranges, by taking advantage of a climatic room operating at the Piaggio sites, and the contemporary use of several algorithms for real-time elaborations. Besides the real-time characteristics already introduced and discussed previously, such further steps are essential for applying the proposed architecture on board an aircraft, and to increase reliability aspects by accessing the possibility of comparing different information derived from different sources. The activities herein reported have been carried out within the Italian segment of the RESUME project, a joint co-operation between the Ministry of Defense of Israel and the Ministry of Defense of Italy.

Keywords: composite structures; damage characterization; real-time processing; sensors; smart devices; structural health monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General view of a small composite wing-box demonstrator.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Wing-box section from which the test article has been taken.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Actual test configuration: (a) left picture reports the climatic chamber specifically designed to host the test rig; and (b) right picture reports the bending actuator installed on the test article, while the compression actuator is detached.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Load direction in compression and bending configuration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Thermal scan of the wing-box under thermal conditioning—test @ 70 °C.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Optical fibers and damage locations—sketch. Embedded optical fibers are shown in light green and coded according the letters A, B, C, and D, while the qualitative positions of the FBG arrays are reported in the tallow oval. Damage locations are presented as blue parallelograms, and their numbering is reported in white digits.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic layout of the additional fibers installed on the wing-box, bottom panel, with the associated code; namely, 03 and 04 for the rear spar; and 01, 02, and 05 for the front spar. For the sake of clarity, a synthetic scheme of the flaws and fiber positions is reported, for both the spars, top and bottom. These same schematics are used to describe the results, in the last part of the paper.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Hardware setup.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Block diagram of the experimental set-up.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Screenshot of the SHM module running in real-time mode. Red box indicates the channel (arr1 and arr2) with the corresponding bar plot and the readout (damage detected at sensor number 2).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing bending load each curve characterized by a different color. For an embedded FBG sensors array, along the front spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; and (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Cumulative damage index under bending: red line sensor A; black line sensor B; TL as the dashed blue line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing compression load each curve characterized by a different color. For FBG sensors embedded array, along the front spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Cumulative damage index under compression: red line sensor A; black line sensor B; TL as the dashed blue line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing bending load each curve characterized by a different color. For FBG sensors embedded array, along the rear spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Cumulative damage index under bending: red line sensor C; black line sensor D; TL as the dashed blue line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing compression load each curve characterized by a different color. For FBG sensors embedded array, along the rear spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 18
Figure 18
Cumulative damage index under compression: red line sensor C; black line sensor D; TL as the dashed blue line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 19
Figure 19
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing bending load each curve characterized by a different color. For FBG sensors bonded array, along the front spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 20
Figure 20
Cumulative damage index under bending: black line fiber 01; red line fiber 02; blue line fiber 05; TL as the dashed green line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 21
Figure 21
Strain distribution in the function of the increasing bending load each curve characterized by a different color. For FBG sensors bonded array, along the rear spar; (a) the incremental strain at room temperature; (b) the incremental strain at high temperature.
Figure 22
Figure 22
Damage index under bending: red line fiber 03; black line fiber 04, TL as the dashed green line; (a) the cumulative damage index at room temperature; (b) the cumulative damage index at high temperature.
Figure 23
Figure 23
Main results for damage detection by fibers A and B. The black color refers to the position of the damage.
Figure 24
Figure 24
Main results for damage detection by fibers C and D. The black color refers to the position of the damage.
Figure 25
Figure 25
Main results for damage detection by fiber 02. The black color refers to the position of the damage. The arrow indicate the fiber under test.
Figure 26
Figure 26
Main results for damage detection by fiber 05. The black color refers to the position of the damage. The arrow indicate the fiber under test.
Figure 27
Figure 27
Main results for damage detection by fiber 03. The black color refers to the position of the damage. The arrow indicate the fiber under test.
Figure 28
Figure 28
Main results for damage detection by fiber 04. The black color refers to the position of the damage. The arrow indicate the fiber under test.

References

    1. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) STANAG 4671 “UAV Systems Air Worthiness Requirements (USAR) for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)Military UAV Systems”. 1st ed. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); Washington, DC, USA: 2007.
    1. EASA AMC 20–29 Composite Aircraft Structure. [(accessed on 12 March 2022)]. Available online: https://www.easa.europa.eu/downloads/1698/en.
    1. Ewald V., Groves R., Benedictus R. Transducer Placement Option for Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) on Damage Tolerant Aircraft Substructure; Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (IWSHM) 2017: Real-Time Material State Awareness and Data-Driven Safety Assurance; Stanford, CA, USA. 12–14 September 2017; pp. 1811–1818. - DOI
    1. Boller C. Implementation Strategies for SHM in Civil and Military Applications. In: Suleman A., editor. Structural Health Monitoring of Military Vehicles. NATO Science & Technology Organization; Brussels, Belgium: 2014. STO-EN-AVT-220. STO Educational Notes.
    1. Acellent Localized (“Hot Spot”) Monitoring. [(accessed on 27 May 2023)]. Available online: https://www.acellent.com/applications/localized-monitoring.

LinkOut - more resources