Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 28:4:1161157.
doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1161157. eCollection 2023.

Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population

Affiliations

Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population

Santosh Yogendra Shah et al. Front Glob Womens Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a significant cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. It is essential to develop effective prediction models to identify women at risk of PPH and implement appropriate interventions to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. This study aims to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage using machine learning models based on antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal visit data obtained from the Kenya Antenatal and Postnatal Care Research Collective cohort.

Method: Four machine learning models - logistic regression, naïve Bayes, decision tree, and random forest - were constructed using 67% training data (1,056/1,576). The training data was further split into 67% for model building and 33% cross validation. Once the models are built, the remaining 33% (520/1,576) independent test data was used for external validation to confirm the models' performance. Models were fine-tuned using feature selection through extra tree classifier technique. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve.

Result: The naïve Bayes model performed best with 0.95 accuracy, 0.97 specificity, and 0.76 AUC. Seven factors (anemia, limited prenatal care, hemoglobin concentrations, signs of pallor at intrapartum, intrapartum systolic blood pressure, intrapartum diastolic blood pressure, and intrapartum respiratory rate) were associated with PPH prediction in Kenyan population.

Discussion: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models in predicting PPH in the Kenyan population. Future studies with larger datasets and more PPH cases should be conducted to improve prediction performance of machine learning model. Such prediction algorithms would immensely help to construct a personalized obstetric path for each pregnant patient, improve resource allocation, and reduce maternal mortality and morbidity.

Keywords: LMICs; machine learning; maternal health; postpartum hemorrhage; pregnancy; risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SS, SR and NN are employees of CognitiveCare Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary. SYS, SG and MT are founding team members and employees of CognitiveCare Inc. CognitiveCare Inc. has a patent pending for a maternal and infant health intelligence and cognitive insight (MIHIC) system and score to predict the risk of maternal, fetal and infant morbidity and mortality. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of Kenya maternal cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristics curves of four machine learning model of PPH prediction (AUC, area under the curve; GaussianNB, naïve Bayes).
Figure 3
Figure 3
SHAP summary plot of top 7 features for naïve Bayes PPH prediction model. Color represents relative feature value for each patient. Blue color indicates low feature value whereas red color indicates high feature value. Positive SHAP values suggest greater PPH risk and negative SHAP values are protective for PPH (Hb, hemoglobin; ANC, antenatal clinic; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BPM, breaths per minute, SHAP, Shapley Additive exPlanations).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. (2014) 2(6):e323–33. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. (2006) 368(9542):1189–200. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, van Look PF. WHO Analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. (2006) 367(9516):1066–74. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000–2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division (2019). Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/327595 (Accessed November 21, 2022).
    1. Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. (2008) 22(6):999–1012. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources