Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 13;31(2):92-100.
doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_94_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

Update of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Clinical Perspectives - A Review

Affiliations
Review

Update of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Clinical Perspectives - A Review

Shao-Yu Chen et al. J Med Ultrasound. .

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) uses an intravascular contrast agent to enhance blood flow signals and assess microcirculation in different parts of the human body. Over the past decade, CEUS has become more widely applied in musculoskeletal (MSK) medicine, and the current review aims to systematically summarize current research on the application of CEUS in the MSK field, focusing on 67 articles published between January 2001 and June 2021 in online databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. CEUS has been widely used for the clinical assessment of muscle microcirculation, tendinopathy, fracture nonunions, sports-related injuries, arthritis, peripheral nerves, and tumors, and can serve as an objective and quantitative evaluation tool for prognosis and outcome prediction. Optimal CEUS parameters and diagnostic cut off values for each disease category remain to be confirmed.

Keywords: Bone; contrast agent; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; joint; muscle; musculoskeletal medicine; nerve; sonography; tendon; tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Wen-Shiang Chen, an editorial board member at Journal of Medical Ultrasound, had no role in the peer review process of or decision to publish this article. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest in writing this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating our search strategy. Exclusions were mostly due to duplications, non-English publications or animal studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chung YE, Kim KW. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Advance and current status in abdominal imaging. Ultrasonography. 2015;34:3–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Averkiou MA, Bruce MF, Powers JE, Sheeran PS, Burns PN. Imaging methods for ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:498–517. - PubMed
    1. Chang KV, Lew HL, Wang TG, Chen WS. Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in musculoskeletal medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:449–57. - PubMed
    1. Gitto S, Messina C, Vitale N, Albano D, Sconfienza LM. Quantitative musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020;24:367–74. - PubMed
    1. Fischer C, Krix M, Weber MA, Loizides A, Gruber H, Jung EM, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for musculoskeletal applications: A world federation for ultrasound in medicine and biology position paper. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:1279–95. - PubMed