Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 8:11:e15747.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.15747. eCollection 2023.

Recognition of emotion and pain by owners benefits the welfare of donkeys in a challenging working environment

Affiliations

Recognition of emotion and pain by owners benefits the welfare of donkeys in a challenging working environment

Syed S U H Bukhari et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Working donkeys (Equus asinus) support human living standards globally. However, there is little information on the effect of human perceptions of emotion and pain on the welfare of working donkeys. We interviewed donkey owners (n = 332) in Pakistan to determine the relationship between human perspectives on donkey sentience: emotions and the ability to feel pain, and the routine working practices that could impact donkey welfare. The majority of donkey owners used padding under the saddle (n = 211; 63.6%; 95% CI (58.3%-68.9%)) and provided access to food (n = 213; 64.2%; 95% CI (58.9%-69.3%)) and water (n = 195; 58.7%; 95% CI (53.4%-64.1%)) during the working day. Owners reported that at some point in their donkey's life, 65.3% (95% CI (60.2%-70.5%)) had load-associated injuries, of which 27.7% (n = 92; 95% CI (22.8%-32.5%)) were wounds, 20.5% (n = 68; 95% CI (16.1%-24.8%)) were lameness and 7.2% (n = 24; 95% CI 4.4%-10.0%) were back pain. In total, 81.3% (95% CI 77.1%-85.5%; n = 270) of owners believed that their donkeys felt pain, and 70.2% (95% CI (65.2%-75.1%; n = 233) of owners believed that their donkeys had emotions. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used to understand the relationship between owners' recognition of emotions and pain in donkeys and their working practices. The MCA factor map revealed two clusters, named positive and negative clusters. The positive cluster included owner's recognition of donkey pain and emotions, the availability of food and water, use of padding under the saddle, absence of injuries along with the willingness to follow loading guidelines. The negative cluster represented practices that did not benefit donkey welfare, such as using saddles without padding and a lack of food and water during work. The presence of injuries, owners not recognizing that donkeys feel pain and emotion along with an unwillingness to follow loading guidelines were also found in the negative cluster. We show that the owners who recognized sentience in their donkeys were more likely to use practices that are good for donkey welfare. The ability of owners to identify sentience in donkeys, along with their willingness to follow welfare guidelines, are important factors in improving the lives of working donkeys.

Keywords: Animal emotions; Animal pain; Animal sentience; Animal welfare; Donkey welfare; Donkey working practices; Owner behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alan G. McElligott and Rebecca S. V. Parkes are Academic Editors for PeerJ. Sarah M. Rosanowski is an independent epidemiological consultant who consults under Equine Veterinary Consultants (EVC) Limited and Digital Agriculture, Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two examples of loading practices in Pakistan (A) donkeys carrying bricks. (B) A donkey owner loading their animal with lucerne at a farm.
Photos: Syed Saad Ul Hassan Bukhari.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Map of Pakistan showing the locations of the four study regions (sourced from ArcGIS).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) factor map with respect to categorical variables.
Variance explained by dimension one and dimension two was 45.89% and 22.09%, respectively. Color dots represent categorical variables, and signs (+, −, ±, S, A, F, B, R, PU, U) represent their categories.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alhuzali T, Beh EJ, Stojanovski E. Multiple correspondence analysis as a tool for examining Nobel Prize data from 1901 to 2018. PLOS ONE. 2022;17:1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biffa D, Woldemeskel M. Causes and factors associated with occurrence of external injuries in working equines in Ethiopia. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine. 2006;4:1–7.
    1. Birhan G, Chanie M, Tesfaye T, Kassa A, Mekonnen B, Wagaw N. Incidence of wound and associated risk factors in working donkeys in Yilmana Densa District. Global Veterinaria. 2014;13:133–140.
    1. Budaev S, Kristiansen TS, Giske J, Eliassen S. Computational animal welfare: towards cognitive architecture models of animal sentience, emotion and wellbeing. Royal Society Open Science. 2020;7:201886. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201886. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bukhari SSUH, McElligott AG, Parkes RSV. Quantifying the impact of mounted load carrying on equids: a review. Animals. 2021;11:1333. doi: 10.3390/ani11051333. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources