This is a preprint.
CAGI6 ID-Challenge: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs)
- PMID: 37577579
- PMCID: PMC10418555
- DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3209168/v1
CAGI6 ID-Challenge: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs)
Update in
-
CAGI6 ID panel challenge: assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;144(2-3):227-242. doi: 10.1007/s00439-024-02722-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9. Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 39786577 Free PMC article.
Abstract
In the context of the Critical Assessment of the Genome Interpretation, 6th edition (CAGI6), the Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Lab in Padua proposed a new ID-challenge to give the opportunity of developing computational methods for predicting patient's phenotype and the causal variants. Eight research teams and 30 models had access to the phenotype details and real genetic data, based on the sequences of 74 genes (VCF format) in 415 pediatric patients affected by Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs). NDDs are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions, with onset in infant age. In this study we evaluate the ability and accuracy of computational methods to predict comorbid phenotypes based on clinical features described in each patient and causal variants. Finally, we asked to develop a method to find new possible genetic causes for patients without a genetic diagnosis. As already done for the CAGI5, seven clinical features (ID, ASD, ataxia, epilepsy, microcephaly, macrocephaly, hypotonia), and variants (causative, putative pathogenic and contributing factors) were provided. Considering the overall clinical manifestation of our cohort, we give out the variant data and phenotypic traits of the 150 patients from CAGI5 ID-Challenge as training and validation for the prediction methods development.
Keywords: CAGI; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; gene-panel; phenotype prediction; variants interpretation.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






References
-
- Aspromonte M. C., Bellini M., Gasparini A., Carraro M., Bettella E., Polli R., Cesca F., Bigoni S., Boni S., Carlet O., Negrin S., Mammi I., Milani D., Peron A., Sartori S., Toldo I., Soli F., Turolla L., Stanzial F., … Leonardi E. (2019). Characterization of intellectual disability and autism comorbidity through gene panel sequencing. Human Mutation, 40(9), 1346–1363. 10.1002/humu.23822 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Carraro M., Monzon A. M., Chiricosta L., Reggiani F., Aspromonte M. C., Bellini M., Pagel K., Jiang Y., Radivojac P., Kundu K., Pal L. R., Yin Y., Limongelli I., Andreoletti G., Moult J., Wilson S. J., Katsonis P., Lichtarge O., Chen J., … Leonardi E. (2019). Assessment of patient clinical descriptions and pathogenic variants from gene panel sequences in the CAGI-5 intellectual disability challenge. Human Mutation, 40(9), 1330–1345. 10.1002/humu.23823 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous