Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Dec;191(12):2856-2859.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63372. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

An incidental finding in prenatal exome sequencing-A case study and review of the clinical and ethical considerations

Ignatius Rudd  1 , Gulvir Gill  2 , Michael Buckley  3 , Lilian Downie  2   4
Affiliations
Case Reports

An incidental finding in prenatal exome sequencing-A case study and review of the clinical and ethical considerations

Ignatius Rudd et al. Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

The introduction of genomic testing into prenatal care has come at a rapid pace and has been met with significant clinical and ethical challenges, specifically when dealing with incidental findings. We present the case of a couple in their first pregnancy who were referred to our institution with isolated fetal cataracts on morphology scan. After an unremarkable infectious disease workup and microarray on an amniocentesis sample, the couple opted for fetal whole-exome sequencing to investigate the cataracts further. This investigation did not find any cause for the cataracts but yielded an incidental finding of a de novo pathogenic variant in the SCN1A gene unrelated to the cataracts. Pathogenic variants in the SCN1A gene are strongly associated with severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, or Dravet syndrome. After extensive genetic counseling, the couple decided to terminate the pregnancy at 28 weeks' gestation based on this finding. This case highlights some of the important clinical and ethical considerations in prenatal genetic diagnosis, particularly in the group of patients in which there is no phenotypic evidence in-utero of the incidental finding. The case demonstrates the value of frameworks and guidelines to guide management decisions for both clinicians and patients.

Keywords: SCN1a mutation; congenital cataracts; incidental findings; prenatal exome sequencing; secondary findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brew, C. E., Castro, B. A., Pan, V., Hart, A., Blumberg, B., & Wicklund, C. (2019). Genetics professionals' attitudes toward prenatal exome sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 28(2), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1112
    1. Chandler, N. J., Scotchman, E., Mellis, R., Ramachandran, V., Roberts, R., & Chitty, L. S. (2022). Lessons learnt from prenatal exome sequencing. Prenatal Diagnosis, 42(7), 831-844. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6165
    1. Halliday, J. L., Muller, C., Charles, T., Norris, F., Kennedy, J., Lewis, S., Meiser, B., Donath, S., Stark, Z., McGillivray, G., Menezes, M., Smith, S. K., Forster, D., Walker, S., Pertile, M., & Amor, D. J. (2018). Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: A prospective study. European Journal of Human Genetics, 26(4), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-017-0084-0
    1. International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Perinatal Quality Foundation. (2018). Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis, 38(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5195
    1. Kalynchuk, E. J., Althouse, A., Parker, L. S., Saller, D. N., Jr., & Rajkovic, A. (2015). Prenatal whole-exome sequencing: Parental attitudes. Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(10), 1030-1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4635

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources