Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1558-1563.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0174.

Assessing a Polygenic Risk Score for Lung Cancer Susceptibility in Non-Hispanic White and Black Populations

Affiliations

Assessing a Polygenic Risk Score for Lung Cancer Susceptibility in Non-Hispanic White and Black Populations

Matthew R Trendowski et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. .

Abstract

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have become an increasingly popular approach to evaluate cancer susceptibility, but have not adequately represented Black populations in model development.

Methods: We used a previously published lung cancer PRS on the basis of 80 SNPs associated with lung cancer risk in the OncoArray cohort and validated in UK Biobank. The PRS was evaluated for association with lung cancer risk adjusting for age, sex, total pack-years, family history of lung cancer, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the top five principal components for genetic ancestry.

Results: Among the 80 PRS SNPs included in the score, 14 were significantly associated with lung cancer risk (P < 0.05) in INHALE White participants, while there were no significant SNPs among INHALE Black participants. After adjusting for covariates, the PRS was significantly associated with risk in Whites (continuous score P = 0.007), but not in Blacks (continuous score P = 0.88). The PRS remained a statistically significant predictor of lung cancer risk in Whites ineligible for lung cancer screening under current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines (P = 0.02).

Conclusions: Using a previously validated PRS, we did find some predictive ability for lung cancer in INHALE White participants beyond traditional risk factors. However, this effect was not observed in Black participants, indicating the need to develop and validate ancestry-specific lung cancer risk models.

Impact: While a previously published lung cancer PRS was able to stratify White participants into different levels of risk, the model was not predictive in Blacks. Our findings highlight the need to develop and validate ancestry-specific lung cancer risk models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Sud A, Kinnersley B, Houlston RS. Genome-wide association studies of cancer: current insights and future perspectives. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017. Nov;17(11):692–704. - PubMed
    1. Conran CA, Shi Z, Resurreccion WK, Na R, Helfand BT, Genova E, et al. Assessing the clinical utility of genetic risk scores for targeted cancer screening. J Transl Med. 2021. Jan 22;19(1):41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Veen EM, Brentnall AR, Byers H, Harkness EF, Astley SM, Sampson S,et al. Use of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Mammographic Density Plus Classic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction. JAMA Oncol. 2018. Apr 1;4(4):476–482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes E, Tshiaba P, Gallagher S, Wagner S, Judkins T, Roa B,et al. Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020. Jun 8;4:PO.19.00360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanwal M, Ding XJ, Cao Y. Familial risk for lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017. Feb;13(2):535–542. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types