Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide"
- PMID: 37579458
- PMCID: PMC10125206
- DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7544
Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide"
Abstract
The evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) guide provides a practical framework for fair priority setting of the health benefits package (HBP) that countries can reasonably use. The steps presented in the EDPs are applicable for prioritising health services in designing HBP and are consistent with practical experience in countries. However, institutionalisation must be considered an element of fairness in the priority-setting process if the aim is to reach broader goals of a health system, such as universal health coverage (UHC). Otherwise, the EDPs for priority setting might not be integrated into the formal health system or impactful, resulting in a waste of time and resources, which is unfair. Institutionalisation means formalising the desired change as an embedded and integrated system so that the change lasts over time. For the institutionalisation of EPDs, four stages are suggested, which are (1) establishing a supportive legal framework, (2) designating governance and institutional structure, (3) stipulating the EDPs processes and (4) individual and institutional capacity building.
Keywords: Essential Health Services; Health Sector Reform; Institutionalisation; Priority Setting; Sustainability; Universal Health Coverage.
© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Comment on
-
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2327-2336. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.159. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. PMID: 34923809 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization. UHC Compendium. Health interventions for Universal Health Coverage. https://www.who.int/universal-health-coverage/compendium. Accessed November 9, 2022.
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Principles of Health Benefit Packages. WHO; 2020.
-
- Glassman A, Giedion U, Smith PC. What’s In, What’s Out: Designing Benefits for Universal Health Coverage. Brookings Institution Press; 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous