Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Interventions for Reducing Avoidable Hospital Readmission: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
- PMID: 37579466
- PMCID: PMC10125127
- DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Interventions for Reducing Avoidable Hospital Readmission: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
Abstract
Background: Avoidable hospital readmission is a major problem among health systems. Although there are effective peri-discharge interventions for reducing avoidable hospital readmission, successful implementation is challenging. This systematic review of qualitative studies aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions from providers' and service users' perspectives.
Methods: We searched four databases for potentially eligible qualitative studies from databases' inception to March 2020, and updated literature search for studies published between January 2020 to October 2021. Barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions were identified and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs. Inductive analysis of the CFIR constructs was performed to yield thematic areas that illustrated the relationship between various facilitators and barriers, generating practical insights to key implementation issues.
Results: Thirteen qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. Key issues were clustered in the CFIR constructs of Design Quality and Complexity of the intervention, strength of Network and Communication, being responsive to Patient Needs with sufficient Resource support, and External Incentives. The three thematic areas were rationality of the interventions, readiness and effort of multidisciplinary implementation teams, and influence of external stakeholders. Common barriers included (i) limited resources, (ii) poor communication among team members, (iii) incompatibility between the new intervention and existing work routine, (iv) complicated implementation process, (v) low practicality of supporting instruments, and (vi) lack of understanding about the content and effectiveness of the new interventions. Common facilitators were (i) information sharing via regular meetings on implementation issues, (ii) organizational culture that values quality and accountability, (iii) financial penalties for hospitals with high avoidable readmissions rates, (iv) external support offered via quality improvement programs and community resources, and (v) senior leadership support.
Conclusion: This study synthesized commonly-presenting barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions among different healthcare organizations. Findings may inform development of implementation strategies in different health systems after appropriate tailoring, based on a consensus-based formative research process.
Keywords: Delivery of Healthcare; Implementation Science; Patient Readmission; Qualitative Research; Systematic Review; Transitional Care.
© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Facilitators, barriers, and guidance to successful implementation of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions: A qualitative systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 29;8:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100269. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024. PMID: 39691681 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Identify Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Communication Service in Five Settings: A Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 18;17(11):e262. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5091. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26582138 Free PMC article.
-
A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 8;23(4):e22399. doi: 10.2196/22399. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33830063 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5. Health Res Policy Syst. 2025. PMID: 39762862 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of an Integrated Digital and Mobile Intervention for COPD Exacerbation.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Feb 14:2025.02.13.25322246. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.13.25322246. medRxiv. 2025. Update in: NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 17;8(1):451. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01871-0. PMID: 39990547 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Practitioners' perspectives on implementation of acute virtual wards: A scoping review.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 9;4(5):e0000858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000858. eCollection 2025 May. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40343985 Free PMC article.
-
Integrated Care Coordination for Managing Chronic Conditions: Views of Health Staff on the Implementation of a Program Using an Algorithm to Identify People at Higher Risk of Hospitalisation in Sydney, Australia.Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Jun 30;14:27536130251356449. doi: 10.1177/27536130251356449. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025. PMID: 40599302 Free PMC article.
-
An Informatics-Based, Payer-Led, Low-Intensity Multichannel Educational Campaign Designed to Decrease Postdischarge Utilization for Medicare Advantage Members: Retrospective Evaluation.JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 27;12:e63841. doi: 10.2196/63841. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40424576 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). 2020. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Inst.... Accessed March 8, 2020.
-
- Bailey MK, Weiss AJ, Barrett ML, Jiang HJ. Characteristics of 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions, 2010-2016. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. - PubMed
-
- Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary MP, Schulman KA, Staelin R. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(1):41–48. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources