Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023:12:6901.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6901. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada

Julia Kontak  1 , Amy Grant  1 , Elizabeth Jeffers  1 , Leah Boulos  1 , Juanna Ricketts  1 , Michael Davies  2 , Marina Hamilton  1 , Jill A Hayden  3
Affiliations
Comment

The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada

Julia Kontak et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023.

Abstract

Background: There is evidence of the benefits of integrated knowledge translation (IKT), yet there is limited research outlining the purpose of a knowledge broker (KB) within this approach. The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) acts as a KB to support patient-oriented research across the Maritime provinces in Canada. The "Bridge Process" was developed by the Nova Scotia (NS) site as a strategy that involves work leading up to and following the Bridge Event. The process supports research addressing priority health topics discussed at the event by stakeholder groups. The objectives of this paper were to (1) describe the outputs/outcomes of this IKT approach; and (2) examine the role of the KB.

Methods: Quantitative data were collected from registration and evaluation surveys. Outputs are described with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected through evaluation surveys and internal documents. Data related to KB tasks were categorized into three domains: (1) Knowledge Manager, (2) Linkage and Exchange Agent, and (3) Capacity Developer.

Results: The Bridge Process was implemented four times. A total of 314 participants including government, health, patient/citizen, community, and research personnel attended the events. We identified 24 priority topics, with 7 led by teams receiving support to complete related projects. Participants reported improved understanding of the research gaps and policy needs and engaged with individuals they would not have otherwise. Although patients/citizens attended each Bridge Event, only 61% of participants who completed an evaluation survey indicated that they were 'actively engaged in group discussion.' The KB's role was identified in all three domains including Knowledge Manager (eg, defining questions), Linkage and Exchange Agent (eg, engaging stakeholders), and Capacity Builder (eg, research interpretation).

Conclusion: The MSSU facilitated an IKT approach by acting as a KB throughout the Bridge Process. This deliberative and sequential process served as an effective strategy to increase collaborative health research in the province.

Keywords: Canada; Integrated Knowledge Translation; Knowledge Broker; Nova Scotia; Priority Setting; Research Partnerships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Graham ID, Kothari A, McCutcheon C. Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0700-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kothari A, Wathen CN. A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy. 2013;109(2):187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pakenham-Walsh N. Learning from one another to bridge the “know-do gap. ” BMJ. 2004;329(7475):1189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1189. - DOI
    1. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Stacey D. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4):221–223. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.08. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert K, Mahoney K, Parfrey PS. Changing health-related behaviors 4: realizing impact of health research through knowledge translation. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:597–612. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_32. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources