Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023:12:6896.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6896. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

What Factors Explain Low Adoption of Digital Technologies for Health Financing in an Insurance Setting? Novel Evidence From a Quantitative Panel Study on IMIS in Tanzania

Affiliations

What Factors Explain Low Adoption of Digital Technologies for Health Financing in an Insurance Setting? Novel Evidence From a Quantitative Panel Study on IMIS in Tanzania

Leon Schuetze et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023.

Abstract

Background: Digital information management systems for health financing are implemented on the assumption thatdigitalization, among other things, enables strategic purchasing. However, little is known about the extent to which thesesystems are adopted as planned to achieve desired results. This study assesses the levels of, and the factors associated withthe adoption of the Insurance Management Information System (IMIS) by healthcare providers in Tanzania.

Methods: Combining multiple data sources, we estimated IMIS adoption levels for 365 first-line health facilities in2017 by comparing IMIS claim data (verified claims) with the number of expected claims. We defined adoption as abinary outcome capturing underreporting (verified<expected) vs. not-underreporting, using four different approaches.We used descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine adoption levels across facilities, districts,regions, and months. We used logistic regression to identify facility-specific factors (ie, explanatory variables) associatedwith different adoption levels.

Results: We found a median (interquartile range [IQR]) difference of 77.8% (32.7-100) between expected and verifiedclaims, showing a consistent pattern of underreporting across districts, regions, and months. Levels of underreportingvaried across regions (ANOVA: F=7.24, P<.001) and districts (ANOVA: F=4.65, P<.001). Logistic regression resultsshowed that higher service volume, share of people insured, and greater distance to district headquarter were associatedwith a higher probability of underreporting.

Conclusion: Our study shows that the adoption of IMIS in Tanzania may be sub-optimal and far from policy-makers'expectations, limiting its capacity to provide the necessary information to enhance strategic purchasing in the healthsector. Countries and agencies adopting digital interventions such as openIMIS to foster health financing reform areadvised to closely track their implementation efforts to make sure the data they rely on is accurate. Further, our studysuggests organizational and infrastructural barriers beyond the software itself hamper effective adoption.

Keywords: Adoption; Digital Health Intervention; Health Financing; Health Insurance; Strategic Purchasing; Tanzania.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MDA and NK declare no competing interests. SS and MS are part of the Swiss TPH project team that is implementing HPSS project under which openIMIS was implemented. ER is a project advisor for HPSS project. LS has a doctoral student agreement with and received travel support by Swiss TPH. AM has performed paid activities with HPSS project in the past.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meessen B. The role of digital strategies in financing health care for universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(Suppl 1):S29–S40. doi: 10.9745/ghsp-d-18-00271. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(11):e1196–e1252. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honda A. What is Strategic Purchasing for Health? RESYST; 2014. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a089c8e5274a27b2000271/....
    1. Figueras J, Robinson R, Jakubowski E. Purchasing to Improve Health Systems Performance. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2005.
    1. Busse R, Figueras J, Robinson R, Jakubowski E. Strategic purchasing to improve health system performance: key issues and international trends. Healthc Pap. 2007;8 Spec No:62–76. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2007.19221. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources