Countering vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of interventions to strengthen healthcare professionals' action
- PMID: 37581903
- PMCID: PMC10567238
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad134
Countering vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of interventions to strengthen healthcare professionals' action
Abstract
Background: Vaccine hesitancy is relevant for healthcare professionals (HCPs) who face challenges in building trusting relationships with patients. Accordingly, the VAX-TRUST project has been developed to improve experiences of HCPs and patients dealing with vaccinations. To support VAX-TRUST, this work aimed to identify latest interventions targeted at HCPs to address hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA by searching PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Articles were eligible if evaluated interventions directly targeted at HCPs/healthcare students. The search was run on 26 January 2022. Articles published in 2016 or after were included.
Results: A total of 17 492 records were identified; 139 articles were selected. Most articles were set in USA (n = 110). Over half had a pre-post design without a control group (n = 78). A total of 41 articles focused on single-component interventions, 60 on multi-component interventions involving only HCPs and/or students and 38 on multi-component interventions involving also other professionals. Main components were in-person education (n = 76), synchronous (n = 10) and asynchronous (n = 23) online learning, educational materials (n = 26), performance assessment and feedback (n = 33), electronic record changes (n = 30), role play/simulation (n = 21) and online games/apps (n = 5). Educational sessions were mainly about scientific update or communication. Outcomes of interventions were grouped in: vaccination rates (n = 69), knowledge (n = 32), attitudes (n = 26), confidence in counselling (n = 30) and acceptability (n = 16).
Conclusions: Apps, gaming, role play/simulations could represent innovative interventions. This review highlighted the need of delving into communication strategies and using more robust evaluations, longer follow-up and standardized measurements.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447007
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Addressing vaccine hesitancy in the training of healthcare professionals: Insights from the VAX-TRUST project.Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Dec 19;9:100569. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100569. eCollection 2025 Jun. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024. PMID: 39877314 Free PMC article.
-
Vaccine hesitancy and healthcare providers.Vaccine. 2016 Dec 20;34(52):6700-6706. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.10.042. Epub 2016 Oct 31. Vaccine. 2016. PMID: 27810314 Review.
-
Parental childhood vaccine hesitancy and predicting uptake of vaccinations: a systematic review.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Nov 4;23:e68. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000512. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022. PMID: 36330835 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Trust matters: The Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe Study.Scand J Public Health. 2024 May;52(3):379-390. doi: 10.1177/14034948231223791. Epub 2024 Feb 12. Scand J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38346923 Free PMC article.
-
Health Technology Assessment del vaccino ricombinante adiuvato contro il virus respiratorio sinciziale (Arexvy®).J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Jun 30;65(2 Suppl 1):E1-E159. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.2s1. eCollection 2024 Sep. J Prev Med Hyg. 2024. PMID: 39554593 Free PMC article. Italian. No abstract available.
-
Unpacking COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Network Analysis Perspective on Related Beliefs and Responses.Int J Behav Med. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10378-7. Online ahead of print. Int J Behav Med. 2025. PMID: 40524089
-
Effects of a Theory- and Evidence-Based, Motivational Interviewing-Oriented Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant on Vaccine Attitudes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e72637. doi: 10.2196/72637. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40779743 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- SAGE Working Group. REPORT SAGE Working Group On Vaccine Hesitancy, 2014. Available at: https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/1_Report_WOR... (10 August 2023, date last accessed).
-
- WHO. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019, 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-... (10 August 2023, date last accessed).
-
- Hadjipanayis A, van Esso D, Del Torso S, et al.Vaccine confidence among parents: large scale study in eighteen European countries. Vaccine 2020;38:1505–12. - PubMed