"We are stewards and caretakers of the land, not exploiters of resources": A qualitative study exploring Canadian farmers' perceptions of environmental sustainability in agriculture
- PMID: 37582088
- PMCID: PMC10427016
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290114
"We are stewards and caretakers of the land, not exploiters of resources": A qualitative study exploring Canadian farmers' perceptions of environmental sustainability in agriculture
Abstract
Environmental sustainability in agriculture is a key component of discussions to address the current climate crisis; unfortunately, many people (including researchers) presume that only certain types of agriculture (e.g., organic, local) are environmentally sustainable. Non-farmers also fail to acknowledge that many farm practices, including grazing animals, mitigate climate change. Farmers' perceptions about environmental sustainability are important because their livelihoods, and those of future generations, depend on their commitment to sustainable environmental practices. The purpose of this qualitative research was to understand Canadian farmers' perceptions of environmental sustainability, how they are implementing strategies that contribute to sustainable food production, and the challenges they face. Fifty-two farmers, representing 48 farms and over 1000 years of farming experience, participated in comprehensive in-depth interviews. Four farms were in British Columbia; 13 in the Prairies; 26 in Central Canada; and five in Eastern Canada. A wide variety of farm types (e.g., fruit/vegetables, livestock, grains) and sizes (2 to 6500 acres) were included in the study. Farmers' perceptions of environmental sustainability coalesced into four main themes: (1) definitions of sustainability and environmental sustainability, (2) current practices, (3) farming as an identity, and (4) challenges. Many participants explained that they already use sustainable practices and technology, contrary to prevailing opinion that entire food systems need to be transformed to be sustainable. As new agricultural policies and educational curricula are developed, information provided to students, policy makers, and the public must be accurate, balanced, evidence-based, and respectfully consider all perspectives, especially those of farmers.
Copyright: © 2023 Carmichael et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci, 2019;14:681–95. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 - DOI
-
- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Introduction to Sustainable Agriculture. [Internet]. King’s Printer for Ontario; 2021, Feb 12 [cited 2022 Aug 23]. Available from: http://omafra.gov.on.ca/english/busdev/facts/15-023.htm.
-
- Canadian Centre for Food Integrity. 2020 Public Trust Research–Trends in Trust and the Path Forward [Internet]. Canadian Centre for Food Integrity; 2020. [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.foodintegrity.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ENG2020Summit-Re....
-
- World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). [Internet]. Our Common Future. New York: United Nations; 1987 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. 300 p. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-f....
-
- Ma W, Wang X. Internet use, sustainable agricultural practices and rural incomes: Evidence from China. Aust J Agric Resour Econ. 2020;64(4):1087–1112. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.12390 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials