Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 15;18(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00378-2.

Promoting employee wellbeing and preventing non-clinical mental health problems in the workplace: a preparatory consultation survey

Affiliations

Promoting employee wellbeing and preventing non-clinical mental health problems in the workplace: a preparatory consultation survey

Evelien Coppens et al. J Occup Med Toxicol. .

Abstract

Background: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face major financial losses due to mental health issues affecting employees at all levels but seldom apply programs to promote wellbeing and prevent mental health issues among employees. To support the development of a multi-country workplace-based mental health intervention for SMEs (MENTUPP), a multinational consultation study was conducted. The study aimed to examine the experiences and needs of SMEs concerning the promotion of employee wellbeing, and the prevention and management of non-clinical mental health problems in workplaces.

Methods: A survey consisting of open and closed questions was designed to assess key informants' opinion about the acceptability, the use, and the implementation of interventions to promote wellbeing and prevent mental health issues in the workplace. Academic experts and representatives of SME organisations, specific sector organisations, labour or advocacy groups, and occupational health organisations across the nine MENTUPP intervention countries (eight European countries and Australia) were invited to complete the survey. Data were collected via the online platform Qualtrics. Sixty-five of 146 informants responded, representing a 44.5% response rate. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data and qualitative data were analysed through thematic analysis.

Results: Measures to create mentally healthy workplaces were most used in SMEs, while more specific mental health interventions, such as training staff on how to promote wellbeing, were hardly used. Managers lack resources to implement mental health interventions and are concerned about employees spending too much time on these interventions during working hours. Receiving information about the economic benefits of mental health interventions and hearing successful testimonials from other SMEs can persuade managers otherwise. Employees have concerns about confidentiality, discrimination and stigma, and career opportunities when using such interventions.

Conclusions: The study identifies a variety of challenges, needs and possibilities related to implementing mental health interventions in SMEs. Employers need to be convinced that investing in mental health in the workplace is worth their time and money. This requires more studies on the (cost-)effectiveness of mental health interventions. Once employers are engaged, their knowledge and competencies about how to implement such interventions should be increased and privacy concerns of employees to participate in them should be addressed.

Keywords: Barriers and facilitators; Construction; Gender; Healthcare; Information and communication technologies (ICT); Mental health; Mental health promotion and intervention in occupational settings (MENTUPP); Small and medium enterprises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arensman E, O’Connor C, Leduc C, Griffin E, Cully G, Ní Dhálaigh D, et al. Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 : 10.3390/ijerph19020947. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barros C, Baylina P, Fernandes R, Ramalho S, Arezes P. Healthcare workers' mental health in pandemic times: the predict role of psychosocial risks. Saf Health Work. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.08.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benning FE, van Oostrom SH, van Nassau F, Schaap R, Anema JR, Proper KI. The Implementation of preventive health measures in small- and medium-sized enterprises – a combined quantitative/qualitative study of its determinants from the perspective of enterprise representatives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. 10.3390/ijerph19073904. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björk JM, Nordmyr J, Forsman AK. Reconciling work and family demands and related psychosocial risk and support factors among working families: a Finnish national survey study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 : 10.3390/ijerph19148566. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boren JP & Veksler AE. Communicatively Restricted Organizational Stress (CROS) I: Conceptualization and overview. Managem Commun Q. 2015, : 10.1177/0893318914558744.

LinkOut - more resources