Family Risk Exposure Profiles During Early Childhood: Developmental Processes and Adolescent Well-Being
- PMID: 37583765
- PMCID: PMC10426761
- DOI: 10.1007/s42844-023-00090-4
Family Risk Exposure Profiles During Early Childhood: Developmental Processes and Adolescent Well-Being
Abstract
Although prior work indicates that exposure to multiple family risk factors negatively impacts adjustment in childhood and adolescence, few studies have examined whether children in high-risk families transition in and out of adversity during early childhood and whether patterns of change matter for adjustment in adolescence. Using data from a sample of 216 caregiver-child dyads participating in a study of prenatal cocaine exposure (116 exposed and 100 non-exposed; 50.9% girls), we used latent transition analysis to identify distinct profiles of early exposure to caregiver substance use (SU) and SU-related familial risk (caregiver psychological distress, exposure to violence, harshness, and low sensitivity) and the association between these profiles and adolescent well-being (i.e., hope, happiness, and life satisfaction). Assessments occurred when children were 13, 24, 36, and 48 months and during kindergarten (Mmonths = 66.16, SD = 4.47) and early adolescence (Myears = 13.26, SD = 0.88). Caregivers self-identified as 72.09% Black, 15.81% White, 10.23% Hispanic/Latinx, 1.40% other, and 0.47% American Indian. Four profiles of varying levels of exposure to caregiver SU and SU-related risks were identified from infancy to kindergarten: SU/family risks, no SU/low family risks, SU/negative parenting, and SU/low family risks. Most children stayed in the same profile (64.2%), while the rest transitioned between profiles. Children exposed to caregiver SU and family adversity had lower positive outcomes in adolescence. Stable membership in the SU/family risks profile had significant maladaptive consequences on adolescent well-being. Implications for research and the design of tailored interventions to promote well-being among at-risk youth are discussed.
Keywords: Adolescence; Caregiver substance use; Early adversity; Latent transition analysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Ackerman BP, Schoff K, Levinson K, Youngstrom E, & Izard CE (1999). The relations between cluster indexes of risk and promotion and the problem behaviors of 6- and 7-year-old children from economically disadvantaged families. Developmental Psychology, 35(6), 1355–1366. 10.1037/0012-1649.35.6.1355 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Akaike H (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov BN & Csake F (Eds.), Second international symposium on information theory (pp. 267–281). Akademiai Kiado.
-
- Bridgett DJ, & Mayes LC (2011). Development of inhibitory control among prenatally cocaine exposed and non-cocaine exposed youths from late childhood to early adolescence: The effects of gender and risk and subsequent aggressive behavior. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 33, 47–60. 10.1016/j.ntt.2010.08.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources