Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Nov 1;25(5):469-477.
doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000872. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

Rapid Implementation of a 3-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Sacrum Implant for Severe Neuropathic Spinal Arthropathy and Guide to Compassionate US Regulatory Approval

Affiliations
Case Reports

Rapid Implementation of a 3-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Sacrum Implant for Severe Neuropathic Spinal Arthropathy and Guide to Compassionate US Regulatory Approval

Miguel A Ruiz-Cardozo et al. Oper Neurosurg. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Rapid design and production of patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed implants (3DPIs) present a novel opportunity to restore the biomechanically demanding integrity of the lumbopelvic junction. We present a unique case of a 61-year-old patient with severe neuropathic spinal arthropathy (Charcot spine) who initially underwent a T4-to-sacrum spinal fusion. Massive bone destruction led to dissociation of his upper body from his pelvis and legs. Reconstruction of the spinopelvic continuity was planned with the aid of a personalized lumbosacral 3DPI.

Method: Using high-resolution computed tomography scans, the custom 3DPI was made using additive titanium manufacturing. The unique 3DPI consisted of (1) a sacral platform with iliac screws, (2) modular corpectomy device with rigid connection to the sacral platform, and (3) anterior plate connection with screws for proximal fixation. The procedures to obtain compassionate use Food and Drug Administration approval were followed. The patient underwent debridement of a chronically open wound before undertaking the 3-stage reconstructive procedure. The custom 3DPI and additional instrumentation were inserted as part of a salvage rebuilding procedure.

Results: The chronology of the rapid implementation of the personalized sacral 3DPI from decision, design, manufacturing, Food and Drug Administration approval, and surgical execution lasted 28 days. The prosthesis was positioned in the defect according to the expected anatomic planes and secured using a screw-rod system and a vascularized fibular bone strut graft. The prosthesis provided an ideal repair of the lumbosacral junction and pelvic ring by merging spinal pelvic fixation, posterior pelvic ring fixation, and anterior spinal column fixation.

Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a multilevel lumbar, sacral, and sacropelvic neuropathic (Charcot) spine reconstruction using a 3DPI sacral prosthesis. As the prevalence of severe spine deformities continues to increase, adoption of 3DPIs is becoming more relevant to offer personalized treatment for complex deformities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Barrey C, Massourides H, Cotton F, Perrin G, Rode G. Charcot spine: two new case reports and a systematic review of 109 clinical cases from the literature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53(3):200-220.
    1. Brown CW, Jones B, Donaldson DH, Akmakjian J, Brugman JL. Neuropathic (Charcot) arthropathy of the spine after traumatic spinal paraplegia. Spine. 1992;17(Supplement):S103-S108.
    1. Devlin VJ, Ogilvie JW, Transfeldt EE, Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford DS. Surgical treatment of neuropathic spinal arthropathy. J spinal Disord. 1991;4(3):319-328.
    1. Sobel J, Bohlman H, Freehafer A. Charcot's arthropathy of the spine following spinal cord injury. A report of five cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67(5):771-776.
    1. Standaert C, Cardenas DD, Anderson P. Charcot spine as a late complication of traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(2):221-225.

References

    1. Kang X, Zhang XB, Gao XD, Hao DJ, Li T, Xu ZW. Bioprinting for bone tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1036375.
    1. Katiyar P, Boddapati V, Coury J, Roye B, Vitale M, Lenke L. Three-dimensional printing applications in pediatric spinal surgery: a systematic review. Glob Spine J. 2023;5:21925682231182341.
    1. Yang M, Li C, Li Y, et al. Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(8):e582.
    1. Mamo HB, Adamiak M, Kunwar A. 3D printed biomedical devices and their applications: a review on state-of-the-art technologies, existing challenges, and future perspectives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;143:105930.

Publication types