Assessment of palatal mucosal thickness and location of the greater palatine foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
- PMID: 37584816
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00699-2
Assessment of palatal mucosal thickness and location of the greater palatine foramen using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to measure the palatal mucosal thickness and examine the location of the greater palatine foramen using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT).
Methods: In this study, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the maxillary posterior region of 120 subjects were evaluated. The palatal mucosal thickness (PMT), palatal width and depth, and location of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) were determined on CBCT. The differences in the palatal mucosal thickness according to gender and palatal width/palatal depth were analyzed. The location of the GPF related to the maxillary molars was noted.
Results: The mean palatal mucosal thicknesses from the canine to the second molar teeth were 3.66, 3.90, 4.06, 3.76, and 3.92 mm, respectively. The mean PMT at the second premolar was statistically thicker than at other regions (p < 0,001). There was no relationship between PMT and gender. However, the palatal depth and width of the males were greater than females. (p = 0.004 and p = 0.014, respectively) PMT in the low palatal vault group had statistically higher compared to the high palatal vault group. (p = 0.023) Greater palatine foramen was mostly observed between second and third molar teeth. (48%).
Conclusions: According to our results, first and second premolar regions can be preferable in soft tissue grafting procedures for safe and successful treatment outcomes. The measurement of the thickness of the palatal mucosa and the evaluation of the greater palatine foramen location before the surgical procedures are essential steps to harvest from the ideal donor site and to achieve optimal surgical outcomes.
Keywords: CBCT; Greater palatine foramen; Palatal mucosal thickness.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate.J Clin Periodontol. 2015 May;42(5):458-61. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12390. Epub 2015 Apr 22. J Clin Periodontol. 2015. PMID: 25817728
-
Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;26(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12053. Epub 2013 Sep 5. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014. PMID: 24548316
-
Quantitative analysis of maxillary palatal masticatory mucosa thickness and anatomical morphology of palatal vault in Zhejiang province.Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Feb 25;51(1):87-94. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0334. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022. PMID: 35462468 Free PMC article. English.
-
What Is the Safety Zone for Palatal Soft Tissue Graft Harvesting Based on the Locations of the Greater Palatine Artery and Foramen? A Systematic Review.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;77(2):271.e1-271.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 11. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019. PMID: 30395825
-
Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature.Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 May;41(5):551-567. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02179-x. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019. PMID: 30617510 Review.
References
-
- Bouchard P, Malet J, Borghetti A. Decision-making in aesthetics: root coverage revisited. Periodontol. 2001;27(1):97–120. - DOI
-
- Miller PD Jr. Root coverage using the free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application III. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5(2):14–37. - PubMed
-
- Tözüm TF, Dini FM. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(1):7–13. - PubMed