Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 1:204:392-400.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.090. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

The Association of the UNOS Heart Allocation Policy Change With Transplant and Left Ventricular Assist Device Access and Outcomes

Daniel K Fox  1 , R J Waken  2 , Fengxian Wang  2 , Jonathan D Wolfe  1 , Keenan Robbins  1 , Erika Fanous  1 , Justin M Vader  1 , Joel D Schilling  3 , Karen E Joynt Maddox  4
Affiliations

The Association of the UNOS Heart Allocation Policy Change With Transplant and Left Ventricular Assist Device Access and Outcomes

Daniel K Fox et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

In October 2018, the allocation policy for adult orthotopic heart transplant (OHTx) in the United States was changed, with the goal of reducing waitlist mortality and providing broader sharing of donor organs within the United States. This study aimed to assess the association of this policy change with changes in access to OHTx versus left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), overall and in key sociodemographic subgroups, in the United States from 2016 to 2019. We identified all patients receiving OHTx or LVAD between 2016 and 2019 using the National Inpatient Sample. Controlling for medical co-morbidities, prepolicy trends, and within-hospital-year effects, we fit a dynamic logistic regression model to evaluate patient and hospital factors associated with receiving OHTx versus LVAD before versus after policy change. We also examined the frequency of temporary mechanical circulatory support in the same fashion. We identified 2,264 patients who received OHTx and 3,157 who received LVADs during the study period. In its first year of implementation, the United Network for Organ Sharing policy change of 2018 was associated with no overall change utilization of OHTx versus LVAD. In OHTx recipients, the frequency of use of temporary mechanical circulatory support changed from 15.6% in the before period to 42.6% in the after period (p <0.001). Although the policy change was associated with differences in the odds of receiving an OHTx versus LVAD between different regions of the country, there were no significant changes based on age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance status, or rurality. In conclusion, the United Network for Organ Sharing policy change on access to OHTx was associated with no overall change in OHTx versus LVAD use in its first year of implementation although we observed small changes in relative odds of transplant based on rurality. Shifts in regional allocation were not significant overall, although certain regions appeared to have a relative increase in their use of OHTx.

Keywords: health policy; left ventricular assist devices (LVADs); orthotopic heart transplant (OHTx); outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Panel A: Quarterly Counts of Heart Transplants (orange) and LVADs (blue) Panel B: Quarterly proportions of Heart Transplants (orange) and LVADs (blue) Tx=transplant; VAD=ventricular assist device
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Panel A: Quarterly Counts of Heart Transplants (orange) and LVADs (blue) Panel B: Quarterly proportions of Heart Transplants (orange) and LVADs (blue) Tx=transplant; VAD=ventricular assist device
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Callahan LR. OPTN/UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee: Proposal to Modify the Adult Heart Allocation System. 2016.
    1. Department OUP. OPTN Board Briefing. Proposal to Modify the Adult Heart Allocation December 2016. 2016.
    1. Schulze PC, Kitada S, Clerkin K, Jin Z, Mancini DM. Regional differences in recipient waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant mortality after the 2006 United Network for Organ Sharing policy changes in the donor heart allocation algorithm. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Estep JD, Soltesz E, Cogswell R. The new heart transplant allocation system: Early observations and mechanical circulatory support considerations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.113 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker WF, Anderson AS, Hedeker D, Huang ES, Garrity ER, Jr., Siegler M, Churpek MM. Geographic Variation in the Treatment of U.S. Adult Heart Transplant Candidates. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71:1715–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.030 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types