Clinical efficacy of simoctocog alfa versus extended half-life recombinant FVIII concentrates in hemophilia A patients undergoing personalized prophylaxis using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison method
- PMID: 37587687
- DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14073
Clinical efficacy of simoctocog alfa versus extended half-life recombinant FVIII concentrates in hemophilia A patients undergoing personalized prophylaxis using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison method
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy of personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) versus three extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates.
Methods: Treatment effects were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons after matching individual patient-level baseline characteristics for simoctocog alfa (pharmacokinetic [PK]-guided personalized prophylaxis) against published aggregate personalized prophylaxis data for efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, and rurioctocog alfa pegol.
Results: A higher percentage (p < .001) of patients with zero bleeds was found with simoctocog alfa compared with efmoroctocog alfa (75% vs. 45%), damoctocog alfa pegol (77% vs. 38%), and rurioctocog alfa pegol (target trough level 1%-3%; 78% vs. 42%). Similar efficacy was found comparing simoctocog alfa against rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12% (77% vs. 62%). The mean total annualized bleeding rate was lower (p < .001) with simoctocog alfa than damoctocog alfa pegol (1.5 vs. 4.9). Consistent with approved dosing, the mean FVIII weekly dose was higher (p < .001) for simoctocog alfa than efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, or rurioctocog alfa pegol 1%-3%, but lower (p < .001) than rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12%.
Conclusions: Indirect comparisons demonstrated that PK-guided, personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa can lead to higher zero bleed rates compared with personalized EHL rFVIII concentrate regimens, albeit with higher weekly doses, and a lower percentage of patients treated twice weekly or less.
Keywords: bleeding; hemophilia A; individualized prophylaxis; recombinant factor VIII; simoctocog alfa.
© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A, et al. WFH guidelines for the management of hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia. 2020;26(suppl 6):1-158. doi:10.1111/hae.14046
-
- Aledort L, Mannucci PM, Schramm W, Tarantino M. Factor VIII replacement is still the standard of care in haemophilia A. Blood Transfus. 2019;17(6):479-486. doi:10.2450/2019.0211-19
-
- Franchini M. The modern treatment of haemophilia: a narrative review. Blood Transfus. 2013;11(2):178-182. doi:10.2450/2012.0166-11
-
- Valentino LA. Considerations in individualizing prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2014;20(5):607-615. doi:10.1111/hae.12438
-
- Collins PW, Fischer K, Morfini M, Blanchette VS, Björkman S. International prophylaxis study group pharmacokinetics expert working group. Implications of coagulation factor VIII and IX pharmacokinetics in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2011;17(1):2-10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02370.x
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical