Intraoperative hypotension when using hypotension prediction index software during major noncardiac surgery: a European multicentre prospective observational registry (EU HYPROTECT)
- PMID: 37588176
- PMCID: PMC10430826
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100140
Intraoperative hypotension when using hypotension prediction index software during major noncardiac surgery: a European multicentre prospective observational registry (EU HYPROTECT)
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with organ injury. Current intraoperative arterial pressure management is mainly reactive. Predictive haemodynamic monitoring may help clinicians reduce intraoperative hypotension. The Acumen™ Hypotension Prediction Index software (HPI-software) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) was developed to predict hypotension. We built up the European multicentre, prospective, observational EU HYPROTECT Registry to describe the incidence, duration, and severity of intraoperative hypotension when using HPI-software monitoring in patients having noncardiac surgery.
Methods: We enrolled 749 patients having elective major noncardiac surgery in 12 medical centres in five European countries. Patients were monitored using the HPI-software. We quantified hypotension using the time-weighted average MAP <65 mm Hg (primary endpoint), the proportion of patients with at least one ≥1 min episode of a MAP <65 mm Hg, the number of ≥1 min episodes of a MAP <65 mm Hg, and duration patients spent below a MAP of 65 mm Hg.
Results: We included 702 patients in the final analysis. The median time-weighted average MAP <65 mm Hg was 0.03 (0.00-0.20) mm Hg. In addition, 285 patients (41%) had no ≥1 min episode of a MAP <65 mm Hg; 417 patients (59%) had at least one. The median number of ≥1 min episodes of a MAP <65 mm Hg was 1 (0-3). Patients spent a median of 2 (0-9) min below a MAP of 65 mm Hg.
Conclusions: The median time-weighted average MAP <65 mm Hg was very low in patients in this registry. This suggests that using HPI-software monitoring may help reduce the duration and severity of intraoperative hypotension in patients having noncardiac surgery.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; blood pressure; haemodynamic instability; haemodynamic monitoring; machine learning; postoperative complications.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
KK, LF, MS, UHF, CDG, JR-M, and DG-L are consultants for and have received honoraria for giving lectures from Edwards Lifesciences (Irvine, CA, USA). KK is a consultant for Vygon (Aachen, Germany). MIMG has been an employee of Edwards Lifesciences at the onset of the registry. EC has received honoraria for giving lectures from Edwards Lifesciences and MSD (Puteaux, France). MS has received research funding for investigator-initiated trials from Edwards Lifesciences, is a consultant for and has received honoraria for giving lectures from AMOMED (Vienna, Austria), and has received honoraria for giving lectures from Orion Pharma (Hamburg, Germany). AAA and BV have received honoraria for giving lectures from Edwards Lifesciences. UHF has received honoraria for giving lectures from CSL Behring (King of Prussia, PA, USA. SJD is a consultant for and has received honoraria for giving lectures and restricted and unrestricted research grants from Edwards Lifesciences. BV is a consultant for Ratiopharm GmbH (Ulm, Germany). EG is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and has received consultant fees from Baxter (Deerfield, IL, USA) and research grants from Radiometer (Krefeld, Germany) and Philips (Böblingen, Germany). EN is a consultant for and received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Masimo (Neuchatel, Switzerland), and MSD. PB is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, and his institution IPPMed received research funding for the organisation of this project. BS is a consultant for and has received institutional restricted research grants and honoraria for giving lectures from Edwards Lifesciences, Baxter, GE Healthcare (Chicago, IL, USA), and Pulsion Medical Systems SE (Feldkirchen, Germany); is a consultant for and has received honoraria for giving lectures from Philips Medizin Systeme Böblingen GmbH (Böblingen, Germany); has received institutional restricted research grants and honoraria for giving lectures from CNSystems Medizintechnik GmbH (Graz, Austria); is a consultant for Maquet Critical Care (Solna, Sweden); has received honoraria for giving lectures from Getinge (Gothenburg, Sweden); is a consultant for and has received honoraria for giving lectures from Vygon; is a consultant for and has received institutional restricted research grants from Retia Medical LLC (Valhalla, NY, USA); has received institutional restricted research grants from Osypka Medical (Berlin, Germany); and was a consultant for and has received institutional restricted research grants from Tensys Medical, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA). IL, GD, and AD declared to have no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Molnar Z., Benes J., Saugel B. Intraoperative hypotension is just the tip of the iceberg: a call for multimodal, individualised, contextualised management of intraoperative cardiovascular dynamics. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:419–423. - PubMed
-
- Bijker J.B., van Klei W.A., Kappen T.H., van Wolfswinkel L., Moons K.G., Kalkman C.J. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension as a function of the chosen definition: literature definitions applied to a retrospective cohort using automated data collection. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:213–220. - PubMed
-
- Wickham A.J., Highton D.T., Clark S., et al. Treatment threshold for intra-operative hypotension in clinical practice—a prospective cohort study in older patients in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2022;77:153–163. - PubMed
-
- Shah N.J., Mentz G., Kheterpal S. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension in moderate to high risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective multicenter observational analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2020;66 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical