Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 26:4:e52.
doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.49. eCollection 2022.

Integrating economic and evolutionary approaches to polygynous marriage

Affiliations
Review

Integrating economic and evolutionary approaches to polygynous marriage

Siwan Anderson et al. Evol Hum Sci. .

Abstract

We outline the potential for integrating economic and evolutionary approaches to marriage and the family. Our broad argument is that the approaches share a concern for competition. Evolutionary scholars are concerned with the fitness consequences of competition and economists are centrally concerned with the nature of competition: how the allocation of scarce resources is mediated by potentially complex forms of social interaction and conflicts of interest. We illustrate our argument by focusing on conceptual and empirical approaches to a topic of interest to economists and evolutionary scholars: polygynous marriage. In comparing conceptual approaches, we distinguish between those that emphasise the physical environment and those that emphasise the social environment. We discuss some advantages of analysing marriage through the lens of competitive markets, and outline some of the ways that economists analyse the emergence of rules governing the family. In discussing empirical approaches to polygynous marriage, we describe how a concern for informing contemporary policy leads economists to focus on the consequences of polygyny, and in particular we describe some of the ways in which economists attempt to distinguish causal effects from selection effects.

Keywords: Marriage; competition; efficiency; family; polygyny.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Gendered conflict in the human family.
    Lawson DW, Alami S, Somefun OD. Lawson DW, et al. Evol Hum Sci. 2023 Apr 24;5:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.8. eCollection 2023. Evol Hum Sci. 2023. PMID: 37587929 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Acemoglu, D. (2003). Why not a political coase theorem? Social conflict, commitment, and politics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31, 620–652.
    1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. By Aghion P. and Durlauf S. N., Elsevier, 385–472.
    1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1167–1199.
    1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). A theory of political transitions. American Economic Review, 91, 938–963.
    1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty (1st ed). Crown.

LinkOut - more resources