Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e029999.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029999. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Affiliations

Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Bethany Barone Gibbs et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. Methods and Results This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh-worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within-person BP variability explained (R2) by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5-minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed: 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings (P<0.05). Conclusions Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM.

Keywords: accelerometer; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; hypertension; physical activity; posture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure .
Figure .
Summary findings of average daytime blood pressure (BP) readings on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) overall, and then with and without considering recent posture and movement. DBP indicates diastolic blood pressure; and SBP, systolic blood pressure.

References

    1. Whelton PK, Jones DW, Maclaughlin EJ, Muntner P, Ovbiagele B, Smith SC Jr, Spencer CC, Stafford RS, Taler SJ, Thomas RJ, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2018;71:E426–E483. - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, Myers MG, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, Townsend RR, et al. Measurement of blood pressure in humans: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019;73:e35–e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zawadzki MJ, Small AK, Gerin W. Ambulatory blood pressure variability: a conceptual review. Blood Press Monit. 2017;22:53–58. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000230 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bo Y, Kwok K‐O, Chung VC‐H, Yu C‐P, Tsoi KK‐F, Wong SY‐S, Lee EK‐P. Short‐term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure measurements: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 35 observational studies. J Hypertens. 2020;38:2095–2109. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002522 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cavelaars M, Tulen JH, van Bemmel JH, Mulder PG, van den Meiracker AH. Reproducibility of intra‐arterial ambulatory blood pressure: effects of physical activity and posture. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1105–1112. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200406000-00010 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources