Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 29;42(8):112990.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112990. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

Enhancing autophagy in CD11c+ antigen-presenting cells as a therapeutic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Affiliations

Enhancing autophagy in CD11c+ antigen-presenting cells as a therapeutic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Christine Quach et al. Cell Rep. .

Abstract

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are severe clinical disorders that mainly develop from viral respiratory infections, sepsis, and chest injury. Antigen-presenting cells play a pivotal role in propagating uncontrolled inflammation and injury through the excess secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and recruitment of immune cells. Autophagy, a homeostatic process that involves the degradation of cellular components, is involved in many processes including lung inflammation. Here, we use a polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C))-induced lung injury mouse model to mimic viral-induced ALI/ARDS and show that disruption of autophagy in macrophages exacerbates lung inflammation and injury, whereas autophagy induction attenuates this process. Therefore, induction of autophagy in macrophages can be a promising therapeutic strategy in ALI/ARDS.

Keywords: CD11c; CP: Immunology; acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); antigen-presenting cells; autophagy; lung inflammation; lung injury; poly(I:C).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Poly(I:C) stimulation induces lung inflammation and injury
(A) C57BL/6 mice were intranasally (i.n.) challenged with 40 μg poly(I:C) for 3 consecutive days, and on the fourth day, AHR was measured and BALF and lungs collected for analysis. (B and C) Lung resistance (B) and dynamic compliance (C) were measured in tracheostomized ventilated mice (n = 5–6 mice per group). (D) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of lung sections (scale bar: 100 μm). (E) Average airway thickness. (F andG) Total number of immune cells in the (F) BALF and in the (G) lungs. (H) Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the BALF quantified by using BioLegend LEGENDplex bead-based immunoassay. (I) FITC-dextran fluorescence intensity. (J) Protein concentration in the BALF. Data are represented as means ± SEM (unpaired Student’s t test). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Poly(I:C) stimulation downregulates autophagy in CD11c+ APCs
(A) Representative western blot of LC3-I and LC3-II and p62 levels in CD11c+ and CD11c cells sorted from the lungs of C57BL/6 mice (n = 7 mice per group) treated with 40 μg poly(I:C) or PBS. (B) Visual representation of the densiometric quantification of LC3-II/LC3-I ratio. (C) Visual representation of the densiometric quantification of p62/β-actin ratio in CD11c+ cells only. Data are represented as means ± SEM (unpaired Student’s t test). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. See also Figure S2.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Lack of autophagy in pulmonary CD11c+ APCs exacerbates lung inflammation and injury
Atg5flox/flox and Atg5KO mice were i.n. challenged with 40 μg poly(I:C) or PBS for 3 consecutive days, and on the fourth day, AHR was measured and BALF and lungs collected for analysis (n = 3–4 mice per group). (A and B) Lung resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) were measured in tracheostomized ventilated mice (n = 3 mice per group). (C) H&E staining of lung sections (scale bar: 100 μm). (D) Average airway thickness. (E and F) Total number of immune cells in the (E) BALF and in the (F) lungs. (G) Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the BALF quantified by using BioLegend LEGENDplex bead-base immunoassay. (H) FITC-dextran fluorescence intensity. (I) Protein concentration in the BALF. Data are represented as means ± SEM (two-way ANOVA). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S3.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Autophagy induction in pulmonary CD11c+ APCs attenuates lung inflammation and prevents lung injury
TFEBflox/flox and TfebTG mice were i.n. challenged with 40 μg poly(I:C) or PBS for 3 consecutive days, and on the fourth day, AHR was measured and BALF and lungs collected for analysis. (A and B) Lung resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) were measured in tracheostomized ventilated mice (n = 3–6 mice per group). (C) H&E staining of lung sections (scale bar: 100 μm). (D) Average airway thickness. (E and F) Total number of immune cells in the (E) BALF and in the (F) lungs. (G) Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the BALF quantified by using BioLegend LEGENDplex bead-base immunoassay. (H) FITC-dextran fluorescence intensity. (I) Protein concentration in the BALF. Data are represented as means ± SEM (two-way ANOVA). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S4.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. A lack of autophagy significantly impacts gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines
(A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in poly(I:C)-treated Atg5KO vs. Atg5flox/flox mice. (B) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in poly(I:C)-treated TfebTG vs. Tfebflox/flox mice. (C) Heatmap representation of cytokines significantly modulated in poly(I:C)-treated Atg5KO mice. (D) Heatmap representation of cytokines significantly modulated in poly(I:C)-treated TfebTG mice. n = 3 mice per group. (E and F) The regulation of genes encoding for relevant M1/M2 markers represented as fold change in poly(I:C)-treated Atg5KO vs. Atg5flox/flox control mice and in (F) TfebTG vs. Tfebflox/flox control mice. (G) The number of M1 and M2 macrophages in the lungs of Atg5flox/flox and Atg5KO mice challenged with poly(I:C). (H–K) Frequency of CD11c+ CD11b+ CD64+ macrophages expressing (H) CD86, (I) CD206, (J) CD163, and (K) CD36. Data are represented as means ± SEM (two-way ANOVA). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S5.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Use of an autophagy inducer, α4-vFLIP, ameliorates lung inflammation and injury
(A) C57BL/6 mice were i.n. challenged with 40 μg poly(I:C) for 3 consecutive days in the morning followed by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of vFLIP (300 mg per mouse) or control peptide, TAT, in the evening. On the fourth day, AHR was measured and BALF and lungs collected for analysis. (B) Western blot analysis of LC3-I and LC3-II and p62 levels in CD11c+ and CD11c cells sorted from the lungs of C57BL/6 mice treated with PBS, poly(I:C) only, poly(I:C) + α4-vFLIP, or poly(I:C) + TAT. (C and D) Lung resistance (C) and dynamic compliance (D) were measured in tracheostomized ventilated mice (n = 3–6 mice per group). (E) H&E staining of lung sections (scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Average airway thickness. (G and H) Total number of immune cells in the (G) BALF and in the (H) lungs. (I) Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the BALF quantified by using BioLegend LEGENDplex bead-base immunoassay. (J) FITC-dextran fluorescence intensity. (K) Protein concentration in the BALF. Data are represented as means ± SEM (one-way ANOVA). ns, not significant, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. See also Figure S6.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, Herridge M, Randolph AG, and Calfee CS (2019). Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 5, 18. 10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wheeler AP, and Bernard GR (2007). Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a clinical review. Lancet 369, 1553–1564. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60604-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matthay MA, Ware LB, and Zimmerman GA (2012). The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2731–2740. 10.1172/JCI60331. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matute-Bello G, Downey G, Moore BB, Groshong SD, Matthay MA, Slutsky AS, and Kuebler WM; Acute Lung Injury in Animals Study Group (2011). An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute lung injury in animals. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 44, 725–738. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0210ST. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang LY, Stuart C, Takeda K, D’Agnillo F, and Golding B (2016). Poly(I:C) Induces Human Lung Endothelial Barrier Dysfunction by Disrupting Tight Junction Expression of Claudin-5. PLoS One 11, e0160875. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types