Vulnerability and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in urban settings in England: A mixed-methods study
- PMID: 37590225
- PMCID: PMC10434856
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281918
Vulnerability and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in urban settings in England: A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Background: Evidence on factors contributing to poor treatment outcome and healthcare priorities in vulnerable populations affected by tuberculosis (TB) in urban areas of England other than London is needed to inform setting-specific prevention and care policies. We addressed this knowledge gap in a cohort of TB patients and healthcare providers in Birmingham and Leicester, UK.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was performed. Logistic regression was used to identify TB patients more likely to have poor treatment outcomes according to clinical and demographic characteristics and social risk factors (SRFs) in a 2013-18 cohort. 25 semi-structured interviews were undertaken in purposely selected individuals (9 patients and 16 healthcare professionals) to glean insights on their healthcare priorities and the factors that contribute to poor treatment outcome.
Results: The quantitative cohort comprised 2252 patients. Those who were ≥ 55 years of age, foreign-born from Central Europe, East Asia and Sub Saharan Africa and with MDR-TB were more likely to have poor treatment outcomes. According to patients and healthcare professionals, the factors that contribute to vulnerability to develop TB and poor treatment outcomes include poor working and living conditions, inadequate or absent welfare protection, poor primary healthcare responsiveness, treatment duration and side effects. These factors could be addressed by increased networking, partnership and integration between healthcare and social services and better integration between primary and secondary healthcare.
Conclusions: In both cities, being ≥ 55 years of age, having MDR-TB and being of foreign-birth are predictors of unfavourable treatment outcome. Risk of poor treatment outcome and vulnerability seem to be multidimensional. A better understanding of specific vulnerabilities and how they affect patient care pathway is needed to design adequate support programmes.
Copyright: © 2023 Berrocal-Almanza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Public Health England (PHE). Public Health England (PHE). Tuberculosis in England report; 2021. [Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
-
- (PHE) PHE. Tackling TB in Under-Served Populations: A Resource for TB Control Boards and their partners 2017. 2017 [Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tackling-tuberculosis-in-unde.... - PubMed
-
- Public Health England. Public Health England (PHE). Collaborative Tuberculosis Strategy for England 2015–2020 2015 [Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
