Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 1:902:166256.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166256. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

Predictions of PFAS regional-scale atmospheric deposition and ambient air exposure

Affiliations

Predictions of PFAS regional-scale atmospheric deposition and ambient air exposure

Emma L D'Ambro et al. Sci Total Environ. .

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large class of human-made compounds that have contaminated the global environment. One environmental entry point for PFAS is via atmospheric emission. Air releases can impact human health through multiple routes, including direct inhalation and contamination of drinking water following air deposition. In this work, we convert the reference dose (RfD) underlying the United States Environmental Protection Agency's GenX drinking water Health Advisory to an inhalation screening level and compare to predicted PFAS and GenX air concentrations from a fluorochemical manufacturing facility in Eastern North Carolina. We find that the area around the facility experiences ~15 days per year of GenX concentrations above the inhalation screening level we derive. We investigate the sensitivity of model predictions to assumptions regarding model spatial resolution, emissions temporal profiles, and knowledge of air emission chemical composition. Decreasing the chemical specificity of PFAS emissions has the largest impact on deposition predictions with domain-wide total deposition varying by as much as 250 % for total PFAS. However, predicted domain-wide mean and median air concentrations varied by <18 % over all scenarios tested for total PFAS. Other model features like emission temporal variability and model spatial resolution had weaker impacts on predicted PFAS deposition.

Keywords: Air quality; Community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model; Emissions; Modeled ambient concentrations; Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Fraction of the year that the grid cells containing the facility, Fayetteville, and Wilmington, are below the PM PFAS measurement detection limit (gray), above the GenX ISL of 7.5 ng m−3 (yellow), and between these two values (green). The GenX PM MDL is 0.017 pg m−3, and the total PFAS MDL is 0.005 pg m−3. Due to rounding, some percentages do not add to 100.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The impact of temporal allocations on domain-wide cumulative deposition. A) Cumulative domain-wide deposition of total PFAS by month for the different emissions allocation scenarios. B) Cumulative domain-wide deposition of GenX (HFPO-DA + HFPO-DAF) by month.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The percent of annual PFAS emissions deposited via wet (blue) and dry (gray scale) deposition within the domain, i.e within ~150 km of the facility, for each of the model scenarios tested herein.

References

    1. Lindstrom AB; Strynar MJ; Libelo EL, Polyfluorinated Compounds: Past, Present, and Future. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (19), 7954–7961. - PubMed
    1. Ghisi R; Vamerali T; Manzetti S, Accumulation of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural plants: A review. Environmental Research 2019, 169, 326–341. - PubMed
    1. Harrad S; de Wit CA; Abdallah MA-E; Bergh C; Björklund JA; Covaci A; Darnerud PO; de Boer J; Diamond M; Huber S; Leonards P; Mandalakis M; Östman C; Haug LS; Thomsen C; Webster TF, Indoor Contamination with Hexabromocyclododecanes, Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers, and Perfluoroalkyl Compounds: An Important Exposure Pathway for People? Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44 (9), 3221–3231. - PubMed
    1. Houde M; De Silva AO; Muir DCG; Letcher RJ, Monitoring of Perfluorinated Compounds in Aquatic Biota: An Updated Review. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (19), 7962–7973. - PubMed
    1. Yamashita N; Kannan K; Taniyasu S; Horii Y; Petrick G; Gamo T, A global survey of perfluorinated acids in oceans. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 51 (8–12), 658–668. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources