Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Sep;55(9):1435-1439.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01466-z. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Exome sequencing identifies breast cancer susceptibility genes and defines the contribution of coding variants to breast cancer risk

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Exome sequencing identifies breast cancer susceptibility genes and defines the contribution of coding variants to breast cancer risk

Naomi Wilcox et al. Nat Genet. 2023 Sep.

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: Exome sequencing identifies breast cancer susceptibility genes and defines the contribution of coding variants to breast cancer risk.
    Wilcox N, Dumont M, González-Neira A, Carvalho S, Joly Beauparlant C, Crotti M, Luccarini C, Soucy P, Dubois S, Nuñez-Torres R, Pita G, Gardner EJ, Dennis J, Alonso MR, Álvarez N, Baynes C, Collin-Deschesnes AC, Desjardins S, Becher H, Behrens S, Bolla MK, Castelao JE, Chang-Claude J, Cornelissen S, Dörk T, Engel C, Gago-Dominguez M, Guénel P, Hadjisavvas A, Hahnen E, Hartman M, Herráez B; SGBCC Investigators; Jung A, Keeman R, Kiechle M, Li J, Loizidou MA, Lush M, Michailidou K, Panayiotidis MI, Sim X, Teo SH, Tyrer JP, van der Kolk LE, Wahlström C, Wang Q, Perry JRB, Benitez J, Schmidt MK, Schmutzler RK, Pharoah PDP, Droit A, Dunning AM, Kvist A, Devilee P, Easton DF, Simard J. Wilcox N, et al. Nat Genet. 2023 Nov;55(11):2009. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01549-x. Nat Genet. 2023. PMID: 37752376 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Linkage and candidate gene studies have identified several breast cancer susceptibility genes, but the overall contribution of coding variation to breast cancer is unclear. To evaluate the role of rare coding variants more comprehensively, we performed a meta-analysis across three large whole-exome sequencing datasets, containing 26,368 female cases and 217,673 female controls. Burden tests were performed for protein-truncating and rare missense variants in 15,616 and 18,601 genes, respectively. Associations between protein-truncating variants and breast cancer were identified for the following six genes at exome-wide significance (P < 2.5 × 10-6): the five known susceptibility genes ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2, together with MAP3K1. Associations were also observed for LZTR1, ATR and BARD1 with P < 1 × 10-4. Associations between predicted deleterious rare missense or protein-truncating variants and breast cancer were additionally identified for CDKN2A at exome-wide significance. The overall contribution of coding variants in genes beyond the previously known genes is estimated to be small.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.J.G. and J.R.B.P. hold shares in and are employees of Insmed Inc. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Manhattan plot of z scores from the meta-analysis assessing the association between protein-truncating variant carriers within genes and breast cancer risk.
The x axis is the chromosomal position, and the y axis is the meta-analyzed z score from testing H0: β = ln(OR) = 0 in the UK Biobank and BCAC datasets (two-tailed). The blue lines correspond to z = ±3.29, P = 0.001, the red lines correspond to z = ±4.71, P = 2.5 × 10−6. All labeled genes are those with P < 0.001. All P values are unadjusted for multiple testing.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Quantile–quantile plot of P values from the meta-analysis assessing the association between protein-truncating variant carriers and breast cancer risk.
P values are from the meta-analyzed z score from testing H0: β = ln(OR) = 0 in the UKB and BCAC datasets (two-tailed). The x axis is the expected log10 P values from the null hypothesis, the y axis is the observed log10 P values. All highlighted genes have P < 0.0005 and are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. All P values are unadjusted for multiple testing.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Manhattan plot of Z-scores from the meta-analysis assessing the association between rare missense variant carriers by gene and breast cancer risk.
The x-axis gives chromosomal position, and the y values are the meta-analyzed Z-scores from testing H0: β = ln (OR)=0 β =ln =0 in the UKB and BCAC datasets (2-tailed). The blue lines correspond to Z=±3.29 ± 3.29, P = 0.001, the red lines correspond to Z=±4.71 ± 4.71, P = 2.5 × 10−6. The labeled genes are those with P < 0.001. All P-values are unadjusted for multiple testing.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. Quantile-quantile plot of P-values from the meta-analysis assessing the association between rare missense variant carriers by gene and breast cancer risk.
P-values are from the meta-analyzed Z-score from testing H0: β=ln(OR)=0β=ln =0 in the UKB and BCAC datasets (2-tailed). The x-axis gives the expected log10 P-values under the null hypothesis and the y-axis the observed log10 P-values Highlighted genes are those with P < 0.0005. Blue corresponds to an increased risk of breast cancer, and cream corresponds to a decreased risk of breast cancer. All P-values are unadjusted for multiple testing.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3. Manhattan plot of Z-scores from the meta-analysis assessing the association between PTV or deleterious (CADD > 20) rare missense variant carriers by gene and breast cancer risk.
The x-axis gives the chromosomal position, and the y values are meta-analyzed Z-scores from testing H0: β = ln (OR) = 0 β = ln =0 in the UKB and BCAC datasets (2-tailed). The blue lines correspond to Z=±3.29 ± 3.29, P = 0.001, the red lines correspond to Z= ± 4.71 ± 4.71, P = 2.5 × 10−6. All labeled genes are those with P < 0.001. All P-values are unadjusted for multiple testing.
Extended Data Fig. 4
Extended Data Fig. 4. Quantile-quantile plot of P-values from the meta-analysis assessing the association between PTV or deleterious (CADD > 20) rare missense variant carriers by gene and breast cancer risk.
P-values are from the meta-analyzed Z-score from testing H0: β = ln(OR)=0 β = ln =0 in the UKB and BCAC datasets (2-tailed). The x-axis gives the expected log10 P-values under the null hypothesis and the y-axis the observed log10 P-values Highlighted genes are those with P < 0.0005. Blue corresponds to an increased risk of breast cancer, and cream corresponds to a decreased risk of breast cancer. All P-values are unadjusted for multiple testing.

References

    1. Dorling L, et al. Breast cancer risk genes—association analysis in more than 113,000 women. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:428–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michailidou K, et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature. 2017;551:92–94. doi: 10.1038/nature24284. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Gonçalo, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2014;95:5–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hujoel MLA, Gazal S, Loh P-R, Patterson N, Price AL. Liability threshold modeling of case–control status and family history of disease increases association power. Nat. Genet. 2020;52:541–547. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0613-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu C, et al. A population-based study of genes previously implicated in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:440–451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types