Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer
- PMID: 37592034
- PMCID: PMC10851171
- DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00808-4
Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer
Abstract
The improved survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely owing to the improved control of systemic disease provided by immune-checkpoint inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, have highlighted the challenges posed by central nervous system (CNS) metastases as a devastating yet common complication, with up to 50% of patients developing such lesions during the course of the disease. Early-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide robust systemic disease control in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLCs, although these agents are usually unable to accumulate to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the CNS owing to an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, the past few years have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of several novel or later-generation TKIs with improved CNS penetrance. Such agents have promising levels of activity against brain metastases, as demonstrated by data from preclinical and clinical studies. In this Review, we describe current preclinical and clinical evidence of the intracranial activity of TKIs targeting various oncogenic drivers in patients with NSCLC, with a focus on newer agents with enhanced CNS penetration, leptomeningeal disease and the need for intrathecal treatment options. We also discuss evolving assessment criteria and regulatory considerations for future clinical investigations.
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
JZ declares personal fees from BMS, AZ, Novartis, Johnson and Johnson, GenePlus, Innovent, Research grants from Merck, Novartis, Johnson and Johnson. JVH declares stock and Other Ownership Interests: Cardinal Spine, Bio-Tree Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Guardant Health, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, EMD Serono, Lilly, Takeda, Sanofi/Aventis, Genentech/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Catalyst Biotech, Foundation medicine, Novartis, Mirati Therapeutics, BrightPath Biotheraputics, Janssen, Nexus Health Systems, Pneuma Respiratory, Kairos Ventures, Roche, Leads Biolabs Research Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Licensing agreement between Spectrum and MD Anderson (including myself) regarding intellectual property for treatment of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutations. XL declares consulting/advisory fees from EMD Serono (Merck KGaA), AstraZeneca, Spectrum Pharmaceutics, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hengrui Therapeutics, Janssen, Blueprint Medicines, Sensei Biotherapeutics, and Abbvie Research Funding from Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Regeneron, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Figures
References
-
- Barnholtz-Sloan JS et al. Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 22, 2865–72 (2004). - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD & Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69, 7–34 (2019). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
