Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Sep;29(9):2286-2294.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02496-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc 18-month follow-up of a phase 1 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc 18-month follow-up of a phase 1 trial

Yi Lin et al. Nat Med. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is a B-cell-maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of a single-arm phase 1 multicenter study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (CRB-401) (n = 62; median follow-up, 18.1 months). The primary endpoint was safety outcomes, and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR). The study met its primary endpoint with low rates of grade 3/grade 4 cytokine release syndrome (6.5%) and neurotoxicity (1.6%). ORR was 75.8%; 64.5% achieved VGPR or better and 38.7% achieved CR or stringent CR. Among exploratory endpoints, median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 10.3, 8.8 and 34.2 months, respectively, and ide-cel expansion in blood and bone marrow correlated with clinical efficacy and postinfusion reduction of soluble BCMA. Patients with PFS ≥ 18 months had more naive and less exhausted T cells in apheresis material and improved functional T cell phenotype in the drug product compared with those with less durable responses. These results confirm ide-cel safety, tolerability and efficacy and describe T cell qualities that correlate with durable response. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier : NCT02658929 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Y.L. received institutional grants and consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite-Gilead and Janssen; institutional grants only from 2Seventy Bio, Merck and Takeda; institutional consulting fees only from Novartis, CellMedica and Legend Biotech; and participated in a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Pfizer and Sorrento. NSR received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and research funding from 2Seventy Bio. J.G.B. reports institutional support from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study; received institutional grants and consulting fees from bluebird bio, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda and CRISPR Therapeutics; received institutional grants only from 2Seventy Bio, Acetylon, CARsgen, Fate Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Karyopharm, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, AbbVie, Amgen, C4 Therapeutics, Cartesian, Celularity, EMD Sorono, Genentech, Icnos Sciences, Lilly, Poseida and Zentalis; and received institutional consulting fees only from Legend Biotech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite Pharma and Secura Bio. D.S.S. reports nonfinancial support from Bristol Myers Squibb during the conduct of the study and received consulting and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb for participation in advisory boards and speaker bureaus. S.J. received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi and Takeda; participated in a Data Monitoring Committee; and has a leadership or fiduciary role at the International Myeloma Society, Society of Hematologic Oncology and American Society of Hematology. D.M. was an employee of Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, at the time the work was conducted and received consulting/advisory fees from Roivant, Takeda, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Legend Biotech, GlaxoSmithKline and Foundation Medicine, but is now an employee of Janssen Oncology with stock and other ownership interests. M.L. reports consultant fees/grants from Allogene, bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Oncopeptides, Sanofi and Takeda. J.R. received grants from Celgene and Bristol Myers Squibb, consulting fees from Parexel, Imaging Endpoint, Bioclinica and Attivare Therapeutics, and participated in a data safety monitoring board for Karyopharm and advisory boards for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Kite Pharma, Partner TX, Celgene and Dava Oncology. M.V.M. received research funding from Kite Pharma and Novartis; royalties from Novartis; consulting fees from Adaptimmune, Agenus, Allogene, Arcellx, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Atara, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cabaletta Bio, Cellectis, CRISPR Therapeutics, Genocea, In8bio, Intellia, GlaxoSmithKline, Kite Pharma, Micromedicine/BendBio, Neximmune, Novartis, Oncternal, Sanofi, TCR2, Tmunity and WindMIL; payment for expert testimony from Australia FPA patent attorneys; participated in a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Adaptimmune, GlaxoSmithKline and Cabaletta Bio; has multiple patents not related to this work; holds stock or has stock options in 2Seventy Bio, Century Therapeutics, Genocea, Neximmune, Oncternal and TCR2; and is on the board of directors for 2Seventy Bio since the completion of this work. M.M., F.P., A.Y. and O.F. report employment at 2Seventy Bio/bluebird bio. F.P. and O.F. also hold stocks in 2Seventy Bio/bluebird bio. A.C., N.M., T.B.C., J.F. and J.R. report employment at Bristol Myers Squibb. Z.Y. and K.H. are former employees of Bristol Myers Squibb. Z.Y. is currently employed at Ascentage Pharma. Z.Y., N.M., T.B.C., J.F., J.R. and K.H. also hold stocks in Bristol Myers Squibb. K.H. also has a leadership or fiduciary role at Mersana Therapeutics, Graphite Bio and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer. J.R. also reports holding stock in Adaptive Biotechnologies. N.C.M. reports stock and other ownership interests from OncoPep, C4 Therapeutics and Raqia, and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, OncoPep, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Novartis, RaqiaPatents, Sebia and Takeda; he is also the recipient of grants from the National Cancer Institute. J.N.K. is the principal investigator of a research agreement between Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb and the National Cancer Institute that provided funding for this work and the principal investigator of a research agreement between Kite, a Gilead company, and the National Cancer Institute; received CAR T cells for this work from Celgene; has a patent for CARs targeting B-cell maturation agent used in this work for which he receives royalties; and has received royalties from Kite, a Gilead Company, and Kyverna for unrelated work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Efficacy outcomes in all dose groups.
Efficacy outcomes include the following: ae, Best overall response by dose (a), DOR by dose (b), DOR by best overall response (c), PFS by dose (d) and OS by dose (e).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. sBCMA dynamics and cellular kinetics associated with DOR.
Box and whisker plots are provided, whereby the center horizontal line denotes the median, and the box denotes the IQR (25th–75th percentiles). The upper whisker extends to the maximum value, but no further than 1.5× IQR above the 75th percentile, and the lower whisker extends to the minimum value, but no lower than 1.5× IQR below the 25th percentile. Data beyond 1.5× IQR from the 25th or 75th percentiles, respectively, are plotted individually as outlying points. a, sBCMA nadir by DOR: >18 months, n = 8 patients; 12–18 months, n = 10 patients; 6–12 months, n = 16 patients; <6 months, n = 13 patients; NR, n = 15 patients. b, Duration of deep pharmacodynamic (greater sBCMA reduction) response by DOR: >18 months, n = 8 patients; 12–18 months, n = 10 patients; 6–12 months, n = 16 patients; <6 months, n = 13 patients; NR, n = 15 patients. c, Concentrations, measured by qPCR, of ide-cel in the PB CD3+ cell matrix on day 14 postinfusion by DOR (P = 0.00003 versus nonresponders, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; P value is not corrected for multiple hypothesis testing): >18 months, n = 3; 12–18 months, n = 7; 6–12 months, n = 7; <6 months, n = 9; NR, n = 8. d, Concentrations, measured by qPCR, of ide-cel in bone marrow aspirate (whole bone marrow matrix) on day 14 postinfusion by DOR (P = 0.001 versus nonresponders, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; P value is not corrected for multiple hypothesis testing): >18 months, n = 3; 12–18 months, n = 7; 6–12 months, n = 7; <6 months, n = 9; NR, n = 8. e, Ratio of bone marrow aspirate (whole bone marrow matrix) to PB CD3+ cell matrix concentrations of ide-cel on day 14 postinfusion by DOR. DOR was binned as 0–6, 6–12, 12–18 and ≥18 months. Duration of deep pharmacodynamic response was defined by the last visit at which sBCMA levels were less than the median nadir (4692 ng l−1): >18 months, n = 3; 12–18 months, n = 7; 6–12 months, n = 7; <6 months, n = 9; NR, n = 8. BM, bone marrow; IQR, interquartile range; NR, nonresponder.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Correlates of long-term responders.
Logistic regression analyses of starting material PBMC and final DP correlates from long-term responders (patients with PFS ≥ 18 months; n = 13) and non-long-term responders (n = 46) and time of recent exposure to selected prior antimyeloma drug classes as a potential correlate of the PBMC and DP variables enriched in long-term responders. Three patients were censored from the total treated population (n = 62) due to study discontinuation before progression (n = 1), start of subsequent antimyeloma therapy before progression (n = 1) and ongoing response with a <18-month progression-free interval (n = 1). Note that the y-axis labels corresponding to the staining patterns defined for each type of cell are shown in the table of median values below the plots. Box plots show nominal P value of the long-term response coefficient from a nonparametric linear regression where rank (Y) ~ long-term response + dose and Y is the rank order value of the PBMC or DP attribute of interest. P values are not corrected for multiple hypothesis testing.

References

    1. Jagannath S, et al. Treatment journeys of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): results from the Connect MM Registry. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20:272–276. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar SK, et al. Multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17046. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016;91:101–119. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nijhof IS, van de Donk N, Zweegman S, Lokhorst HM. Current and new therapeutic strategies for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: an update. Drugs. 2018;78:19–37. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0841-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jagannath S, et al. KarMMa-RW: comparison of idecabtagene vicleucel with real-world outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:116. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00507-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data