FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023
- PMID: 37593813
- PMCID: PMC10482588
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e85
FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023
Abstract
Introduction: Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.
Methods: The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.
Results: Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut).
Summary: The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.
Keywords: Cancer Staging; Endometrial Cancer; Endometrial Cancer Molecular Staging; FIGO Cancer Staging; FIGO Endometrial Cancer Staging.
© 2023. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
All funding stated here is unrelated to the present document. JSB received research funds from Eisai, Immunogen, Karyopharm, and Tesaro (paid to the institution); he participated in the Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Merck and Novocure. CC participated in the Data Safety Monitoring Board of Merck and received compensation for her time; she was Chair of the Endometrial Committee of the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) and Member of the Guidelines Committee of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO); her institution received the Oncentra Research Platform for a clinical study from Elekta. CF received payment or honoraria for her participation in the Advisory Boards from Roche, AstraZeneca/MSD, Clovis, Tesaro, Ethicon, and GSK; she received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and GSK. DG received an NCI UG1 LAPS grant for NCI clinical trials and a grant from Elekta for a clinical trial; he received payment or honoraria for attending the ANZGOG annual meeting; he was Chair for the DSMC Cervix Trial for Merck; he was Co-Chair of the Gynecology Committee of NRG Oncology. SK participated in the Advisory Board for Truscreen Ltd; he was a Council Member of the British Gynaecological Cancer Society and a Trustee for OVACOME. KL received a research grant from GSK; she received payment or honoraria from Eisai, GSK, and Nycode; she participated in the Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Eisai, GSK, AstraZeneca, and MSD; she was on the Board of NSGO-CTU. NC received grants or contracts from the European Commission (FP7 Framework Program); she received consulting fees from Akesobio, Eisai, GSK, AstraZeneca, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV, Seagen, and Immunogen; she received payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from GSK, Kartos, MSD, Medscape Oncology, and TouchIME; she received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Genmab, and Armgen; she participated in a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Akesobio, Eisai, GSK, AstraZeneca, Mersana, Seattle Genetics, eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV, Seagen, and Immunogen; she was ESGO President and Co-Chair of ENGOT Early Drug Development Network. XM-G and DM have no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Evaluating the clinical impact of the 2023 FIGO staging for endometrial cancer: Complexities and considerations.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Dec;291:59-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 7. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023. PMID: 37832479 No abstract available.
References
-
- Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2016. Skin tumours; pp. 131–150.
-
- WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female genital tumours, WHO classification of tumours. Vol. 4. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020.
-
- Jamieson A, Huvila J, Chiu D, et al. Grade and estrogen receptor expression identify a subset of no specific profile endometrial carcinomas at a very low risk of disease specific death. Mod Pathol. 2023;36:100212. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous