Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Sep 1;152(3):e2022060995.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-060995.

Factors Associated With Attendance for Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Evaluation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Factors Associated With Attendance for Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Evaluation

Cynthia M Ortinau et al. Pediatrics. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Neurodevelopmental evaluation of toddlers with complex congenital heart disease is recommended but reported frequency is low. Data on barriers to attending neurodevelopmental follow-up are limited. This study aims to estimate the attendance rate for a toddler neurodevelopmental evaluation in a contemporary multicenter cohort and to assess patient and center level factors associated with attending this evaluation.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of children born between September 2017 and September 2018 who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass in their first year of life at a center contributing data to the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative and Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium clinical registries. The primary outcome was attendance for a neurodevelopmental evaluation between 11 and 30 months of age. Sociodemographic and medical characteristics and center factors specific to neurodevelopmental program design were considered as predictors for attendance.

Results: Among 2385 patients eligible from 16 cardiac centers, the attendance rate was 29.0% (692 of 2385), with a range of 7.8% to 54.3% across individual centers. In multivariable logistic regression models, hospital-initiated (versus family-initiated) scheduling for neurodevelopmental evaluation had the largest odds ratio in predicting attendance (odds ratio = 4.24, 95% confidence interval, 2.74-6.55). Other predictors of attendance included antenatal diagnosis, absence of Trisomy 21, higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery mortality category, longer postoperative length of stay, private insurance, and residing a shorter distance from the hospital.

Conclusions: Attendance rates reflect some improvement but remain low. Changes to program infrastructure and design and minimizing barriers affecting access to care are essential components for improving neurodevelopmental care and outcomes for children with congenital heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose and no financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of CNOC center participation and patient eligibility for the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Attendance rates for neurodevelopmental evaluation between 11–30 months as a function of selected patient medical characteristics, together with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Attendance rates for neurodevelopmental evaluation between 11–30 months by center as a function of site size and follow-up scheduling process, together with 95% confidence intervals. Site size refers to number of infants with a CPB surgery in the first year of life during the time frame of this study. Follow-up scheduling was either hospital-initiated or family-initiated.

References

    1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 15 2011;58(21):2241–7. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 19 2002;39(12):1890–900. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01886-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erikssen G, Liestol K, Seem E, et al. Achievements in congenital heart defect surgery: a prospective, 40-year study of 7038 patients. Circulation. Jan 27 2015;131(4):337–46; discussion 346. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Triedman JK, Newburger JW. Trends in Congenital Heart Disease: The Next Decade. Circulation. Jun 21 2016;133(25):2716–33. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023544 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Aug 28 2012;126(9):1143–72. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318265ee8a - DOI - PubMed

Publication types