Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec;35(6):390-396.
doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures

B J M van de Wall et al. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Presentation of a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of scapular fractures and the clinical outcome using this technique.

Indications: Displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula body and glenoid neck (AO 14B and 14F) and simple intra-articular fractures of the glenoid.

Contraindications: Complex intra-articular fractures and isolated fractures of the coracoid base.

Surgical technique: Make a straight or slightly curved incision along the lateral margin of the scapula leaving the deltoid fascia intact. Identify the interval between the teres minor muscle and infraspinatus to visualize the lateral column, whilst retracting the deltoid to visualize the glenoid neck. Reduce and align the fracture using direct and indirect reduction tools. A second window on the medial border of the scapula can be made to aid reduction and/or to augment stability. Small (2.0-2.7 mm) plates in a 90° configuration on the lateral border and, if required, on the medial border are used. Intra-operative imaging confirms adequate reduction and extra-articular screw placement.

Postoperative management: Direct postoperative free functional nonweight-bearing rehabilitation limited to 90° abduction for the first 6 weeks. Sling for comfort. Free range of motion and permissive weight-bearing after 6 weeks.

Results: We collected data from 35 patients treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) between 2011 and 2021. Average age was 53 ± 15.1 years (range 21-71 years); 17 had a type B and 18 a type F fracture according the AO classification. All patients suffered concomitant injuries of which thoracic (n = 33) and upper extremity (n = 25) injuries were most common. Double plating of the lateral border (n = 30) was most commonly performed as described in the surgical technique section. One patient underwent an additional osteosynthesis 3 months after initial surgery due to pain and lack of radiological signs of healing of a fracture extension into the spine of the scapula. In the same patient, the plate on the spine of scapula was later removed due to plate irritation. In 2 patients postoperative images showed a screw protruding into the glenohumeral joint requiring revision surgery. After standardisation of intra-operative imaging following these two cases, intra-articular screw placement did not occur anymore. No patient suffered from iatrogenic nerve injury and none developed a wound infection.

Zusammenfassung: OPERATIONSZIEL: Präsentation des minimal-invasiven Zugangs zur Versorgung von Skapulafrakturen samt klinischem Ausgang.

Indikationen: Dislozierte, extraartikuläre Frakturen des Skapulablatts sowie des Collum scapulae (AO 148 und 14F) sowie einfache intraartikuläre Frakturen des Glenoids.

Kontraindikationen: Komplexe intraartikuläre Frakturen und isolierte Frakturen der Basis des Processus coracoideus.

Operationstechnik: Setzen einer geraden oder leicht gebogenen Inzision entlang des lateralen Rands der Skapula unter Intaktlassen der Deltafaszie. Identifikation des Intervalls zwischen M. teres minor und M. infraspinatus zur Visualisierung des lateralen Skapulablatts. Der Deltamuskel wird dabei nach kranial weggehalten, um den Skapulahals zu visualisieren. Frakturreposition unter Verwendung von direkten und indirekten Repositionsinstrumenten. Ein zweites Fenster über der Facies medialis der Skapula kann dabei zur besseren Visualisierung oder Stabilisierung eröffnet werden. Verwendung kleiner (2,0–2,7 mm), im 90°-Winkel zueinander angeordneter Platten entlang der lateralen Begrenzung der Skapula oder – sofern nötig – medialseitig. Die intraoperative Kontrolle mittels Bildwandler bestätigt die korrekte Reposition und Lage des Osteosynthesematerials.

Weiterbehandlung: Sofortige postoperative funktionelle Behandlung ohne Belastung bis zur Horizontalen während der ersten 6 Wochen. Armschlinge zum Komfort. Nach 6 Wochen freie Beweglichkeit und Belastung.

Ergebnisse: Zwischen 2011 und 2021 behandelten wir 35 Patienten mit der MIPO(minimal-invasive Plattenosteosynthese)-Technik, welche im Mittel über 8 Monate (Bandbreite von 3 bis 31 Monate) nachbehandelt wurden. Das Durchschnittsalter belief sich auf 53 ± 15,1 Jahre (Bandbreite 21 bis 71); 17 Patienten wiesen eine B‑Fraktur, 18 eine F‑Fraktur nach AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)-Klassifikation auf. In der Mehrzahl der Fälle (n = 30) erfolgte eine laterale Doppelplattenosteosynthese wie unter der Rubrik Operationstechnik beschrieben. Ein Patient wurde 3 Monate nach initialer Osteosynthese erneut operiert aufgrund von Schmerzen und fehlender radiologischer Konsolidation eines Frakturausläufers in die Spina scapulae. Die daraufhin eingebrachte Platte auf der Spina wurde später aufgrund von störendem Osteosynthesematerial wieder entfernt. Bei 2 Patienten erfolgte eine Revision aufgrund einer intraartikulär im Glenohumeralgelenk liegenden Schraube. Keiner der Patienten zeigte iatrogene Nervenläsionen oder Wundinfekte.

Keywords: Deltoid sparing; MIPO; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Scapula fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.J.M. van de Wall, R.J. Hoepelman, C. Michelitsch, N. Diwersi, C. Sommer, R. Babst and F.J.P. Beeres declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Positioning of the patient and C‑arm. b Patient after draping
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A straight incision along the lateral margin of the scapula or a slightly curved more cosmetic incision directed towards the axilla is performed. A full thickness skin and subcutaneous flap is created leaving the superficial deltoid fascia intact
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The deltoid margin, infraspinatus and teres minor are identified
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The deltoid is retracted cranially (abduction of the shoulder with additional padding may also help removing the deltoid muscle out of the operating field) and the interval between teres minor and infraspinatus is identified. This interval is frequently not well defined. A helpful anatomical landmark is the fact that the infraspinatus muscle usually has diamond shaped muscle fibres, whilst the teres minor has linear fibres. Furthermore the interval can also be found by palpating the lateral border of the scapula: infraspinatus lies superior and the teres minor inferior to the lateral scapular border. Failure to identify the correct interval might cause damage to the axial nerve that runs between the teres minor and major laterally
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The ascending branch of the circumflex scapular artery frequently runs across the lateral margin of the scapula in the interval between teres minor and infraspinatus. This artery should be ligated or cauterized to prevent troublesome bleeding
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a After identification of the interval between the infraspinatus and teres minor the lateral margin of the scapula is identified. The fracture zone is exposed and cleared. b Reduction and alignment of the lateral margin is achieved using two reduction forceps on either side of the fracture. To maintain reduction, a 2.0 mm (or 2.7 mm) plate may be positioned and fixed on the lateral edge of the scapula (leaving space for a 2.7 mm plate on the surface of the scapular body which will ultimately provide the required stability). An alternative for maintaining reduction is the use of two Schanz screws (2.5 mm) and connecting them with a rod from the mini external fixator set
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
a The 2.7 mm plate should be precontoured keeping the glenopolar angle (30–40°) in mind. The plate is positioned on the dorsal aspect, along the lateral border of the scapula. Preliminary fixation with K‑wires is advisable. b It is important in this phase to obtain adequate intraoperative radiographs with a free projection of the joint glenohumeral joint to exclude intra-articular positioning of the most cranial K‑wire. The direction of the cranial K‑wire may be used as a reference when placing the screws in the cranial part (near the glenohumeral joint) of the plate. At the end of the procedure multidirectional intra-operative radiographs should be obtained
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
a In case of a comminuted lateral border in which rigid fixation is not possible or medial displacement (> 1 cm), an additional incision over the medial margin is performed. The medial incision and precedent reduction of the the margo medialis is made neutralizing the medial–lateral displacement of the scapular body fragment and adding reduction. Addressing the medial side first might also be beneficial in cases of severe comminution of the lateral margin where no good reference for reduction can be obtained. If required, additional windows can be made over the spina scapulae, in case of fractures extending to this part of the scapula. b The intra-operative images show fracture reduction using four 2.7 mm plates
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Number of osteosyntheses for scapula fractures on a yearly basis

References

    1. Schroder LK, Gauger EM, Gilbertson JA, Cole PA. Functional outcomes after operative management of extra-articular glenoid neck and scapular body fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(19):1623–1630. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole PA, Dugarte AJ. Posterior scapula approaches: extensile and modified Judet. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S10–S1. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001208. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gauger EM, Cole PA. Surgical technique: a minimally invasive approach to scapula neck and body fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(12):3390–3399. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1970-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mannambeth R, Kirzner NB, Moaveni AK. Can displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula be stabilized through a direct lateral-column approach. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 4):S626–S630. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed