Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-Based Warfarin, Apixaban, and Rivaroxaban Versus Standard Warfarin for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Ontario, Canada
- PMID: 37596504
- DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01309-z
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-Based Warfarin, Apixaban, and Rivaroxaban Versus Standard Warfarin for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Ontario, Canada
Abstract
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based warfarin (i.e., warfarin dosing following genetic testing), apixaban, and rivaroxaban oral anticoagulation versus standard warfarin for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥ 65 years.
Methods: We developed a Markov decision-analytic model to compare costs [2017 Canadian dollars (C$)] and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the Ontario health care payer perspective over a life-time horizon. The parameters used in the model were derived from the published literature, the Ontario health care administrative database, and expert opinion. To account for the uncertainty of model parameters, we conducted extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The results were summarized using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
Results: We found that PGx-based warfarin had an ICER of C$17,584/QALY compared with standard warfarin, and apixaban had an ICER of C$64,590/QALY compared with PGx-based warfarin in our base-case analysis. Rivaroxaban was extendedly dominated by PGx-based warfarin and apixaban. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apixaban, rivaroxaban, PGx-based warfarin, and standard warfarin were cost-effective at some willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. PGx-based warfarin had a higher probability of being cost-effective than apixaban (51.3% versus 14.3%) at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. At a WTP threshold of C$100,000/QALY, apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective than PGx-based warfarin (54.6% versus 22.6%).
Conclusion: We found that PGx-based warfarin for patients with AF is cost-effective at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. Apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective (> 50%) at a WTP threshold of C$93,000/QALY.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan.Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Mar;37(3):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0487-7. Clin Drug Investig. 2017. PMID: 27988835
-
US cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban compared with warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, focusing on equal value of life years and health years in total.J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jan;14(1):e240163. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0163. Epub 2024 Nov 28. J Comp Eff Res. 2025. PMID: 39606884 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) in Iran.Clin Cardiol. 2024 Jun;47(6):e24311. doi: 10.1002/clc.24311. Clin Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38923583 Free PMC article.
-
Economic Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin for Venous Thromboembolism in Thailand: A Cost-Utility Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 11;20(4):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043176. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36833871 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on apixaban.Adv Ther. 2012 Jun;29(6):491-507. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0026-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7. Adv Ther. 2012. PMID: 22684583 Review.
Cited by
-
The history of warfarin.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2025 May;53(3):148-150. doi: 10.1177/0310057X251323777. Epub 2025 Apr 26. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2025. PMID: 40285513 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Moving Forward with Taking a Societal Perspective: A Themed Issue on Productivity Costs, Consumption Costs and Informal Care Costs.Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Sep;41(9):1027-1030. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01307-1. Epub 2023 Aug 2. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023. PMID: 37530935 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bezabhe WM, Bereznicki LR, Radford J, Wimmer BC, Curtain C, Salahudeen MS, et al. Ten-year trends in the use of oral anticoagulants in Australian general practice patients with atrial fibrillation. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:2. - DOI
-
- Ho KH, Van Hove M, Leng G. Trends in anticoagulant prescribing: a review of local policies in English primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5058-1 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical