Adapting Ourselves, Instead of the Environment: An Inquiry into Human Enhancement for Function and Beyond
- PMID: 37597122
- PMCID: PMC11052783
- DOI: 10.1007/s12124-023-09797-6
Adapting Ourselves, Instead of the Environment: An Inquiry into Human Enhancement for Function and Beyond
Abstract
Technology enables humans not only to adapt their environment to their needs but also to modify themselves. Means of Human Enhancement - embodied technologies to improve the human body's capabilities or to create a new one - are the designated means of adapting ourselves instead of the environment. The debate about these technologies is typically fought on ethical soil. However, alarmist, utopian, and science fiction scenarios distract from the fact that Human Enhancement is a historical and pervasive phenomenon incorporated into many everyday practices. In the vein of disentangling conceptual difficulties, we claim that means of Human Enhancement are either physiologically or psychologically embodied, rendering the merging with the human user their most defining aspect. To fulfill its purpose, an enhancement must pass the test-in-the-world, i.e., assisting with effective engagement with a dynamic world. Even if failing in this regard: Human Enhancement is the fundamental and semi-targeted process of changing the users relationship with the world through the physical or psychological embodiment of a hitherto external object and/or change of one's body. This can potentially change the notion of being human. Drawing on a rich body of theoretical and empirical literature, we aim to provide a nuanced analysis of the transformative nature of this phenomenon in close proximity to human practice. Stakeholders are invited to apply the theory presented here to interrogate their perspective on technology in general and Human Enhancement in particular.
Keywords: Embodiment; Ethics; Human Enhancement; Human-Technology Relationship; Material Engagement; Postphenomenology.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Early object relations into new objects.Psychoanal Study Child. 2001;56:39-67; discussion 68-75. doi: 10.1080/00797308.2001.11800664. Psychoanal Study Child. 2001. PMID: 12102023
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Science fiction and human enhancement: radical life-extension in the movie 'In Time' (2011).Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9831-4. Med Health Care Philos. 2018. PMID: 29560602
-
The New Mythology of the Body and the Transformation of the Therapeutic Space.Am J Ther. 2023 Sep-Oct 01;30(5):e439-e446. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001661. Am J Ther. 2023. PMID: 37713688 Review.
-
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1. Nurs Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 12914311 Review.
References
-
- Aagaard J. Introducing postphenomenological research: A brief and selective sketch of phenomenological research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2016;30(6):519–533. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2016.1263884. - DOI
-
- Adams G, Estrada-Villalta S, Sullivan D, Markus HR. The psychology of neoliberalism and the neoliberalism of psychology. Journal of Social Issues. 2019;75(1):189–216. doi: 10.1111/josi.12305. - DOI
-
- Agar, N. (2010). Humanity’s end: Why we should reject radical enhancement. MIT Press.
-
- Agar, N. (2014). Truly human enhancement: A philosophical defense of limits. Basic bioethics. MIT Press. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/truly-human-enhancement.
-
- Allenby, B. R., & Sarewitz, D. R. (2011). The techno-human condition. MIT Press.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources