Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 19;13(1):13509.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40810-5.

A large-scale analysis of refractive errors in students attending public primary schools in Mexico

Affiliations

A large-scale analysis of refractive errors in students attending public primary schools in Mexico

Marco Antonio Ramírez-Ortiz et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted from September 2013 through July 2014 to determine the prevalence of refractive errors among students attending public primary schools in Mexico. Among 3,861,156 students at 14,566 public primary schools in all 32 states of Mexico, teachers identified reduced visual acuity in 1,253,589 (32.5%) using visual acuity measurement. Optometrists confirmed 391,498 [31.2%, mean (SD) age: 8.8 (1.9) years; 204,110 girls (52.9%)] had refractive errors using visual acuity measurement and noncycloplegic static retinoscopy. Among 288,537 (72.4%) of children with previous eyeglasses usage data reported, 241,505 (83.7%) had uncorrected refractive errors. Before prescription eyeglasses were provided, 281,891 students (72%) had logMAR visual acuity ≤ 0.2; eyeglasses corrected vision loss in 85.6% (n = 241,352) of them. Simple myopic astigmatism was the most frequent refractive error (25.7%, n = 100,545). Astigmatism > - 1.00 diopters was present in 54.6% of all students with ametropia. The anisometropia rate based on spherical equivalent difference between right and left eye ≥ 1.50 diopters was 3.9% (n = 15,402). Uncorrected refractive errors are an important issue in primary school students in Mexico. An updated study is needed to analyze the evolving trends over the past decade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.A.E. was a paid consultant of VBAM during this study; the remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of right eye noncycloplegic spherical equivalent in diopters (D) for students who failed school vision screening, by age group: 6–8 years, 9–10 years, and 11–12 years old.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Retinoscopes: Past and present.
    Musa M, Enaholo E, Bale BI, Salati C, Spadea L, Zeppieri M. Musa M, et al. World J Methodol. 2024 Sep 20;14(3):91497. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i3.91497. eCollection 2024 Sep 20. World J Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39310243 Free PMC article.

References

    1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. Glob. Health. 2021;9:e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. Glob. Health. 2021;9:e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashemi H, et al. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2017;30:3–22. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cao H, et al. The prevalence and causes of pediatric uncorrected refractive error: Pooled data from population studies for Global Burden of Disease (GBD) sub-regions. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0268800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holden BA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. - DOI - PubMed