Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec;9(12):1069-1084.
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

Spatial promoter-enhancer hubs in cancer: organization, regulation, and function

Affiliations
Review

Spatial promoter-enhancer hubs in cancer: organization, regulation, and function

Jingru Zhao et al. Trends Cancer. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Transcriptional dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer and can be driven by altered enhancer landscapes. Recent studies in genome organization have revealed that multiple enhancers and promoters can spatially coalesce to form dynamic topological assemblies, known as promoter-enhancer hubs, which strongly correlate with elevated gene expression. In this review, we discuss the structure and complexity of promoter-enhancer hubs recently identified in multiple cancer types. We further discuss underlying mechanisms driving dysregulation of promoter-enhancer hubs and speculate on their functional role in pathogenesis. Understanding the role of promoter-enhancer hubs in transcriptional dysregulation can provide insight into new therapeutic approaches to target these complex features of genome organization.

Keywords: cancer; multiway interaction; promoter–enhancer hub.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests None declared by authors.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Graphical representation of promoter–enhancer hubs linearly and spatially.
Top: one promoter regulated by two enhancers. Bottom: two promoters that are regulated by two enhancers.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Evidence suggests that multiway interactions among enhancers and promoters are dynamic.
Hence, a promoter may be interacting with one, both, or none of its enhancers at a given time.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. Various assays offer different perspectives of enhancer–promoter interactions.
Top: five nuclei depicting two alleles that contain a promoter (green), and two enhancers (blue and yellow). Bottom-left: DNA-FISH-based assays can be used to measure pairwise and multiway interactions at individual alleles of a given locus. Bottom-right: Hi-C-based assays cannot measure multiway interactions but can be used to find highly connected promoter–enhancer pairs genome-wide.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Example of events influencing oncogenic promoter–enhancer hubs.
Top-left: changes in binding of one TF can activate previously inactive enhancers and recruit other partner TFs. Top-right: Genetic alterations can create novel binding sites for TFs and alter enhancer activity, inducing gene expression. Bottom: loss of insulation can lead to de novo contacts to enhancers.

References

    1. Nuebler J. et al. (2018) Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E6697–E6706. 10.1073/pnas.1717730115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rao SS et al. (2014) A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoenfelder S and Fraser P (2019) Long-range enhancer-promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat Rev Genet 20, 437–455. 10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verschure PJ et al. (1999) Spatial relationship between transcription sites and chromosome territories. J Cell Biol 147, 13–24. 10.1083/jcb.147.1.13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calo E and Wysocka J (2013) Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol Cell 49, 825–837. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources