Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 4:14:1109238.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109238. eCollection 2023.

Impaired decision-making in borderline personality disorder

Affiliations

Impaired decision-making in borderline personality disorder

Bettina Bajzát et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex mental disorder with core symptoms like interpersonal instability, emotion dysregulation, self-harm, and impulsive decision-making. Previous neuropsychological studies have found impairment in the decision-making of patients with BPD related to impulsivity. In our study, we focus on a better, more nuanced understanding of impulsive decision-making in BPD with the help of Rogers' decision-making test that simulates a gambling situation.

Methods: A novelty of our study is that we excluded from further analysis non-compliant participants based on their performance. Outlier participants on the measures proportion of good choices and average of wager choice number were filtered out to represent the population that understood the basic premise of the task and showed minimal motivation to gain rewards. Thus participants often choosing the less likely color or frequently choosing the first bet amount available (to probably speed up the test) were omitted from further analysis. Another novelty is that we assessed and reported six variables that examine Deliberation Time, Quality of Decision, Risk-taking, Overall proportion bet, Delay aversion, and Risk adjustment. Forty-three women with BPD participated in the study, and 16 non-compliant were excluded. As for the healthy control group, 42 women participated in the study, and four non-compliant were excluded. Thus, we compared the data of 27 patients with BPD with 38 healthy controls.

Results: Our results show that there are significant differences amongst the groups regarding the Quality of Decision Making (F (1,63) = 5.801, p = 0.019) and Risk Adjustment (F (1,63) = 6.522, p = 0.013). We also found significant interactions between group and winning probability regarding Risk Taking (F (4,252) = 4.765 p = 0.001) and Overall proportion of bets, i.e., the average proportion of bets relative to the total score of the subject (F (4,252) = 4.505, p = 0.002).

Discussion: Our results show that the two groups use different decision-making strategies that can have various associations with everyday life situations.

Keywords: borderline personality disorders; decision-making; exclusion criteria based on compliance with the test; impulsivity; neuropsychology; risk-taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of the Decision-making task. The blue-red ratio is visible at the top, the current score is shown in the middle left, and the current bet is in the blue square.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outlier detection. Notes: X axis was the Means of good choice, where the cut point is 0.8, and the Y axis was the average bet order, where the cut point is 1.5. Sixteen persons who have been excluded are marked in blue.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in Deliberation times between BPD and CTRL groups along the probabilities of winning.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Differences in Quality of decision between BPD and CTRL groups along the probabilities of winning.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Differences in Risk taking between BPD and CTRL groups along the probabilities of winning.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Differences in Overall proportion bet between BPD and CTRL groups along the probabilities of winning.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Differences in Risk adjustment between BPD and CTRL groups along the probabilities of winning.

References

    1. Abraham M., Nussbaum M. D. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM, 5th ed. Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, PMID: - DOI
    1. Bazanis E., Rogers R. D., Dowson J. H., Taylor P., Meux C., Staley C., et al. . (2002). Neurocognitive deficits in decision-making and planning of patients with DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder. Psychol. Med. 32, 1395–1405. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006657, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bechara A., Damasio H., Damasio A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral cortex 10, 295–307. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bechara A., Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Anderson S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bechara A., Damasio H., Damasio A. R., Lee G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J. Neurosci. 19:5473. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05473.1999, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed