Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 4:17:1181674.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1181674. eCollection 2023.

Odor Hedonic Profile (OHP): a self-rating tool of everyday odors

Affiliations

Odor Hedonic Profile (OHP): a self-rating tool of everyday odors

Bontempi Charlotte et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Odor hedonic estimation (pleasant/unpleasant) is considered the first and one of the most important dimensions in odor perception. Although there are several published scales that rate odor hedonicity, most of them use odorants that induce biases related to stimulus properties or test conditions and make difficult clinical or industrial applications. Thus, this study aimed to propose a model of odor hedonic profile (OHP) based on 14 items related to everyday odors without stimulus. The OHP is a self-rating tool based on the hedonic estimate representation and allows the determination of specific profiles, i.e., "conservative," "neutral," "liberal," "negative olfactory alliesthesia," and "positive olfactory alliesthesia." It can be useful in different contexts (e.g., food studies) and general pathologies (e.g., eating disorders) or pathologies with mood/emotional disturbances (e.g., depression).

Keywords: everyday odors; hedonic valence; olfaction; pleasantness; self-rating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mean and standard deviation of scores for all items in the entire population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total scores: number of participants for each total score range (e.g., 40 to 49.5 means that total score I comprised between 40 and 49.5 included). The total score (TS) is the absolute value of the sum of the hedonic scores of all items. Each item is rated on a dashed line ranging from −9 to 0 for unpleasant polarity and from 0 to +9 for pleasant polarity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The mean and standard deviation of scores for all items in the men population.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The mean and standard deviation of scores for all items in the women population.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of individual profiles: scores for all items. (A) liberal profile (man); (B) conservative profile (man); (C) neutral profile (woman); (D) positive alliesthesia profile (man); and (E) negative alliesthesia profile (woman).

References

    1. Atanasova B., El-Hage W., Chabanet C., Gaillard P., Belzung C., Camus V. (2010). Olfactory anhedonia and negative olfactory alliesthesia in depressed patients. Psychiat. Res. 176, 190–196. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.11.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atanasova B., Mondon K., Dreyfuss L., Beaufils E., Desmidt T., Hommet C., et al. (2018). Hedonic assessment of odors: A comparison of two sensory scales for use with Alzheimer's disease patients and elderly individuals. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 61, 929–938. 10.3233/JAD-170433 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auffarth B. (2013). Understanding smell - the olfactory stimulus problem. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1667–1679. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bontempi C., Jacquot L., Brand G. (2021). Sex differences in odor hedonic perception: An overview. Front. Neurosci. 15, 764520. 10.3389/fnins.2021.764520 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bontempi C., Jacquot L., Brand G. (2022a). A study on the relationship between odor hedonic rating and individual odor detection threshold. Sci. Rep. 12, 18482. 10.1038/s41598-022-23068-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources