Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 3:17:1162851.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1162851. eCollection 2023.

Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review

Meredith C Costello  1 , Emily L Errante  1   2 , Taylor Smartz  1 , Wilson Z Ray  3 , Allan D Levi  1   2 , Stephen Shelby Burks  1   2
Affiliations

Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review

Meredith C Costello et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury.

Methods: PubMed and Embase were sourced from 1995 to August 2022. Selection was based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight hundred and thirty-five articles were screened with seven being included in this review.

Results: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with peripheral nerve injuries were represented. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. A variety of nerve injuries were represented with all being in the upper extremity and supraclavicular region. Electrical stimulation protocols and evaluation varied. Electrodes were implanted in four studies with one also implanting the stimulator. Length of stimulation per session was either 20 mins or 1 h. Median stimulation frequency was 20 Hz. Stimulation intensity varied from 3 to 30V; pulse width ranged from 0.1 to 1.007 ms. Three protocols were conducted immediately after surgery. Patients were followed for an average of 13.5 months and were evaluated using electrophysiology and combinations of motor, sensory, and functional criteria.

Discussion: Patients who received electrical stimulation consistently demonstrated better recovery compared to their respective controls. Electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is a novel treatment that has not been well-studied in humans. Our review illustrates the potential benefit in implementing this approach into everyday practice. Future research should aim to optimize protocol for clinical use.

Keywords: clinical application; electrical stimulation; peripheral nerve injury; recovery; reinnervation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram outlining study selection process (Page et al., 2021).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aglah C., Gordon T., Posse de Chaves E. I. (2008). cAMP promotes neurite outgrowth and extension through protein kinase A but independently of Erk activation in cultured rat motoneurons. Neuropharmacology. 55, 8–17. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlborn P., Schachner M., Irintchev A. (2007). 1 h electrical stimulation accelerates functional recovery after femoral nerve repair. Exp. Neurol. 208, 137–144. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.08.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Majed A. A., Brushart T. M., Gordon T. (2000b). Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 4381–4390. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.01341.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al-Majed A. A., Neumann C. M., Brushart T. M., Gordon T. (2000a). Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration. J. Neurosci. 20, 2602–2608. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02602.2000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Majed A. A., Tam S. L., Gordon T. (2004). Electrical stimulation accelerates and enhances expression of regeneration-associated genes in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 24, 379–402. 10.1023/B:CEMN.0000022770.66463.f7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types