Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 3:11:988882.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.988882. eCollection 2023.

Acceptability of restrictions in the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based survey in Denmark and Sweden

Per Nilsen  1 , Ida Seing  2 , Mandeep Sekhon  3 , Thomas Kallemose  4 , Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen  5 , Nina Thórný Stefánsdóttir  4 , Karsten Vrangbæk  6 , Ove Andersen  4   7 , Jeanette Wassar Kirk  4   5
Affiliations

Acceptability of restrictions in the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based survey in Denmark and Sweden

Per Nilsen et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Denmark and Sweden initially adopted different responses to the COVID-19 pandemic although the two countries share many characteristics. Denmark responded swiftly with many mandatory restrictions. In contrast, Sweden relied on voluntary restrictions and a more "relaxed" response during the first wave of the pandemic. However, increased rates of COVID-19 cases led to a new approach that involved many more mandatory restrictions, thus making Sweden's response similar to Denmark's in the second wave of the pandemic.

Aim: The aim was to investigate and compare the extent to which the populations in Denmark and Sweden considered the COVID-19 restrictions to be acceptable during the first two waves of the pandemic. The study also aimed to identify the characteristics of those who were least accepting of the restrictions in the two countries.

Materials and methods: Cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Denmark and Sweden in 2021. The study population was sampled from nationally representative web panels in the two countries, consisting of 2,619 individuals from Denmark and 2,633 from Sweden. The questionnaire captured key socio-demographic characteristics. Acceptability was operationalized based on a theoretical framework consisting of seven constructs and one overarching construct.

Results: The respondents' age and gender patterns were similar in the two countries. The proportion of respondents in Denmark who agreed with the statements ("agree" alternative) that captured various acceptability constructs was generally higher for the first wave than the second wave of the pandemic. The opposite pattern was seen for Sweden. In Denmark, 66% in the first wave and 50% in the second wave were accepting of the restrictions. The corresponding figures for Sweden was 42% (first wave) and 47% (second wave). Low acceptance of the restrictions, defined as the 25% with the lowest total score on the seven acceptability statements, was associated with younger age, male gender and lower education levels.

Conclusion: Respondents in Sweden were more accepting of the restrictions in the second wave, when the country used many mandatory restrictions. In contrast, respondents in Denmark were more accepting of the restrictions in the first wave than in the second wave, implying an increased weariness to comply with the restrictions over time. There were considerable socio-demographic differences between those who expressed low acceptance of the restrictions and the others in both countries, suggesting the importance of tailoring communication about the pandemic to different segments of the population.

Keywords: COVID-19; acceptability; compliance; restrictions; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stacked bar chart showing the acceptability of restrictions in Denmark during the two waves of the pandemic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stacked bar chart showing the acceptability of restrictions in Sweden during the two waves of the pandemic.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; (1990).
    1. Mishra S, Scott JA, Laydon DJ, Flaxman S, Gandy A, Mellan TA, et al. . Comparing the responses of the UK, Sweden and Denmark to COVID-19 using counterfactual modelling. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:16342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95699-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marin C. Europe versus coronavirus—Putting the Danish model to the test. Paris: Institut Montaigne; (2020).
    1. Seing I, Stefansdottir NT, Kirk JW, Andersen O, Tjörnhöj-Thomsen T, Kallemose T, et al. . Social distancing policies in the coronavirus battle: a comparison of Denmark and Sweden. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:10990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010990, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coronavirus Resource Center . John Hopkins University of Medicine (2020/2021). Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (Accessed October 17, 2021).

Publication types