Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10;11(4):e11537.
doi: 10.1002/aps3.11537. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.

Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies

Affiliations

Target capture and genome skimming for plant diversity studies

Flávia Fonseca Pezzini et al. Appl Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Recent technological advances in long-read high-throughput sequencing and assembly methods have facilitated the generation of annotated chromosome-scale whole-genome sequence data for evolutionary studies; however, generating such data can still be difficult for many plant species. For example, obtaining high-molecular-weight DNA is typically impossible for samples in historical herbarium collections, which often have degraded DNA. The need to fast-freeze newly collected living samples to conserve high-quality DNA can be complicated when plants are only found in remote areas. Therefore, short-read reduced-genome representations, such as target capture and genome skimming, remain important for evolutionary studies. Here, we review the pros and cons of each technique for non-model plant taxa. We provide guidance related to logistics, budget, the genomic resources previously available for the target clade, and the nature of the study. Furthermore, we assess the available bioinformatic analyses, detailing best practices and pitfalls, and suggest pathways to combine newly generated data with legacy data. Finally, we explore the possible downstream analyses allowed by the type of data generated using each technique. We provide a practical guide to help researchers make the best-informed choice regarding reduced genome representation for evolutionary studies of non-model plants in cases where whole-genome sequencing remains impractical.

Keywords: barcoding; coalescent analysis; herbaria; non‐model plants; short‐read sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of Ceiba species reads mapping back to a reference for sequencing runs using two baits sets: (1) based on a closely related genus (Adansonia) and (2) based on the same genus (Ceiba) including introns. S = silica samples, H = herbarium samples.

References

    1. Allen, J. M. , Boyd B., Nguyen N., Vachaspati P., Warnow T., Huang D. I., Grady P. G. S., et al. 2017. Phylogenomics from whole genome sequences using aTRAM. Systematic Biology 66: 786–798. - PubMed
    1. Alsos, I. G. , Lavergne S., Merkel M. K. F., Boleda M., Lammers Y., Alberti A., Pouchon C., et al. 2020. The treasure vault can be opened: Large‐scale genome skimming works well using herbarium and silica gel dried material. Plants 9: 432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andermann, T. , Cano Á., Zizka A., Bacon C., and Antonelli A.. 2018. SECAPR—A bioinformatics pipeline for the rapid and user‐friendly processing of targeted enriched Illumina sequences, from raw reads to alignments. PeerJ 6: e5175. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andermann, T. , Torres Jiménez M. F., Matos‐Maraví P., Batista R., Blanco‐Pastor J. L., Gustafsson A. L. S., Kistler L., et al. 2020. A guide to carrying out a phylogenomic target sequence capture project. Frontiers in Genetics 10: 1047. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group . 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531–553.

LinkOut - more resources