Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep;176(9):1235-1239.
doi: 10.7326/M23-1011. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

The Medicare Appropriate Use Criteria Program: A Review of Recommendations for Testing in Coronary Artery Disease

Affiliations
Review

The Medicare Appropriate Use Criteria Program: A Review of Recommendations for Testing in Coronary Artery Disease

David E Winchester et al. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Congress established the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Program to reduce unnecessary advanced imaging studies. Organizations that wish to develop AUC can apply to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to qualify as provider-led entities (PLEs) under this program. Variable methods, content, and formatting of PLE-generated AUC could lead to clinician uncertainty about whether an advanced imaging test is appropriate or not.

Purpose: To review AUC published by CMS-qualified PLEs focused on advanced imaging tests for coronary artery disease (CAD), a "priority clinical area" identified by CMS.

Data sources: Publicly available data from the worldwide web searched on 29 August 2022.

Study selection: Approved AUC with recommendations related to testing for CAD.

Data extraction: Manual review of published AUC by all authors.

Data synthesis: Among the 17 CMS-qualified PLEs, only 7 had published AUC related to CAD. Substantial variation in the methods and formatting of these AUCs was observed. The number of clinical scenarios covered ranged from 6 to 210, and the number of advanced imaging methods covered ranged from 1 to 25. When specifically applied to clinical scenarios, many AUC offered no guidance on appropriateness; those that did conflicted with respect to appropriateness.

Limitation: Other CMS-identified priority clinical areas were not evaluated.

Conclusion: CMS-qualified AUC for imaging of CAD are heterogeneous and sometimes discrepant, creating substantial potential for uncertainty among clinicians seeking to provide their patients with appropriate imaging tests.

Primary funding source: No funding was received for this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-1011.

LinkOut - more resources