Trauma and Critical Care Military-Civilian Publications Increased After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review
- PMID: 37603939
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.025
Trauma and Critical Care Military-Civilian Publications Increased After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: There continues to be a growing demand for military-civilian partnerships (MCPs) in research collaborations developing medical trauma care in domestic and international affairs. The objective of this comprehensive review is to investigate the difference in the quantity of MCP trauma and critical care publications before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A systematic literature review was performed for the calendar years 2018 and 2021 utilizing MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed a three-tiered review of 603 English language articles to identify trauma-related military and/or civilian partners and describe the changes in geographical relationships.
Results: A total of 96 (2018) and 119 (2021) articles met screening criteria for trauma and critical care studies and were used for final data extraction. Ultimately, 59 (2018) and 71 (2021) papers met the inclusion criteria of identifying trauma/critical care MCPs and identified both military and civilian partners. There was also an increase from 10 (2018) to 17 (2021) publications that mentioned advocacy for MCP. Using the author affiliations, four regional MCP types were recorded: of 2018 articles, locoregional (3.4%), US-national (47.5%), single international country (42.4%), and between multiple countries (6.8%); of 2021 articles, locoregional (15.5%), US-national (38%), single international country (29.6%), and between multiple countries (16.9%). There has been an increase in the number of locoregional and multinational MCPs and an overall increase in the number of collaborative trauma publications and MCP advocacy papers. A national geographical heat map was developed to illustrate the changes from 2018 to 2021.
Conclusions: There has been an increase in the number of recorded trauma and critical care MCP publications post-pandemic. The growth in the number of manuscripts in more regions post-pandemic suggests an increase in the recognition of collaborations that contribute not only to conflict readiness but also advancements in trauma and surgical care.
Keywords: Critical care; Military civilian partnerships; Surgical research; Trauma.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Data-driven readiness: A preliminary report on cataloging best practices in military civilian partnerships.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S155-S159. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003694. Epub 2022 May 23. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022. PMID: 35562843
-
Quality of Integration of Air Force Trauma Surgeons Within the Center for Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills, Cincinnati: A Pilot Study.Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):2100-2106. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad441. Mil Med. 2024. PMID: 37997688
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Comparison of Military and Civilian Methods for Determining Potentially Preventable Deaths: A Systematic Review.JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 1;153(4):367-375. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6105. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29466560
-
The 16-year evolution of a military-civilian partnership: The University of Alabama at Birmingham experience.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Aug 1;95(2S Suppl 1):S19-S25. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004051. Epub 2023 May 15. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023. PMID: 37184467 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous