Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes
- PMID: 37604352
- PMCID: PMC10840617
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2023.07.006
Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of group prenatal care (GPNC) compared with individual prenatal care (IPNC) on psychosocial outcomes in late pregnancy, including potential differences in outcomes by subgroups.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: An academic medical center in the southeastern United States.
Participants: A total of 2,348 women with low-risk pregnancies who entered prenatal care before 20 6/7 weeks gestation were randomized to GPNC (n = 1,175) or IPNC (n = 1,173) and stratified by self-reported race and ethnicity.
Methods: We surveyed participants during enrollment (M = 12.21 weeks gestation) and in late pregnancy (M = 32.51 weeks gestation). We used standard measures related to stress, anxiety, coping strategies, empowerment, depression symptoms, and stress management practices in an intent-to-treat regression analysis. To account for nonadherence to GPNC treatment, we used an instrumental variable approach.
Results: The response rates were high, with 78.69% of participants in the GPNC group and 83.89% of participants in the IPNC group completing the surveys. We found similar patterns for both groups, including decrease in distress and increase in anxiety between surveys and comparable levels of pregnancy empowerment and stress management at the second survey. We identified greater use of coping strategies for participants in the GPNC group, particularly those who identified as Black or had low levels of partner support.
Conclusion: Group prenatal care did not affect stress and anxiety in late pregnancy; however, the increased use of coping strategies may suggest a benefit of GPNC for some participants.
Keywords: anxiety; coping strategies; group prenatal care; pregnancy; prenatal care; randomized control trial; stress management.
Copyright © 2023 AWHONN, the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest or relevant financial relationships.
Similar articles
-
Group vs Individual Prenatal Care and Gestational Diabetes Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30763. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37642966 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE study): rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of centeringpregnancy and birth outcomes.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 13;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1295-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28403832 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Impact of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes in Medicaid Eligible Women.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):919-928. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7469. Epub 2019 Jun 28. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019. PMID: 31259671
-
Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD010215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010215.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32187661 Free PMC article.
-
Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD012203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012203.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30556599 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The impact of group antenatal care on newborns: Results of a cluster randomized control trial in Eastern Region, Ghana.BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05225-9. BMC Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39558280 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics, & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2017). Guidelines for perinatal care. https://www.acog.org/clinicalhttps://www.acog.org/clinical-information/p...
-
- Angrist JD, Imbens GW, & Rubin DB (1993). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455. 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical